I did give the chapter.Again, there's no chapter and verse--only an assumption as to what must have or might have been happening.
Do you see a different explanation than the one that I have given?
I did give the chapter.Again, there's no chapter and verse--only an assumption as to what must have or might have been happening.
I used the plural, choices.BTW--if the woman doesn't have a choice in the matter, then it is forced slavery.
LOLI choked on a piece of steak, when I met my wife. That's how I knew that she cared about me.
At least you're being honest about this.Well, since I naturally get nervous around a woman that I am attracted to, I am not really acting so much, as using that nervousness to communicate non-verbally that I am attracted to her. In this way, I am not asking for a commitment from her, but she sees it as a genuine form of flattery.
We have a tendency to Pose in certain circumstances. Whether it's at church, on the job, around a group of guys, or with a lady we are interested in. We do this because we have this image in our minds of what were suppose to be like. Some times that image comes from acceptance or rejection of what the world around us tells us we're suppose to be. Other times it's insecurities were trying to make up for or we're just trying to be the person that we think others around us want or need us to be. The major problem with that when it comes to dating is that the woman may fall in love with your pose and not you. Then your stuck acting like someone your not trying to keep her love or you run the risk of losing her love even if the true you was someone she could love because you deceived her.
What!??! Crazy talk!
You have to have your pick up lines ready:
https://pickup-lines.net/best/
and then work on the kino escalation!
And practice, practice practice!
He wasn’t the kinsman redeemer.
Naomi skipped the one that was, presumably because she knew that it was a lost cause.
Boaz chose to follow protocol and become the kr by giving the rightful one first right of refusal. I don’t think that Naomi expected this because Ruth was a Moabite and therefore not qualified for consideration under the Law. The true kr obviously didn’t think that she was, or he would have already stepped up.
Again, there's no chapter and verse--only an assumption as to what must have or might have been happening. And then there's the argument I hear from so many that "it's ONLY the younger widows that are given permission or commanded to remarry".
To elaborate on what Steve said: I think you're getting a little backwards on how to determine what is right and wrong. Sin is disobedience to the Law. Without the Law, there is no sin. Therefore, everything is permissible unless it is forbidden somewhere.I am not sure where permission is needed or given.
The passage is actually about receiving permission to be cared for by the church.
Attempting to combine a response relating to both of your comments. I'd be interested in feedback on this because this embodies one of the biggest questions which has formed in my mind over the past few weeks. VV76 and Wellbelovedwife and I have discussed this very topic. In our society today and culture, it is absolutely considered immoral, taboo, unconscienable that a lady would even consider pursuing a relationship with a man she KNOWS is already married.
If the single man is seeking a wife, or if the man is married and seeking another wife as in BF it seems that is viewed as his God-given place and right. But for single women, widows, or divorced ladies to consider taking that sort of action--it's been inbred in us that we can't! We've been told all our lives the male must seek us out, pursue, initiate the contact, etc. Yet, as I've read some comments on this forum I'm led to believe women actually approach men?!?
I hope someone will respond and provide some clarity on this. I can't make any sense out of it--the right or the wrong OR is there a right or wrong?
It is both.This was not a situation of a young widow approaching a married man; it had everything to do with the rights of a near kinswoman and kinsman redeemer.
But with government support, most single women are semi-married to the State.
I am not sure where permission is needed or given.
The passage is actually about receiving permission to be cared for by the church.
Also, if you read between the lines in 1 Timothy 5, you see younger widows being told to get married instead of depending on the church.
With the problem being that men were being martyred, there would have to be s shortage of available single men. The only choice that they would have is to choose a likely family and make an application for membership. Probably through an intermediary, but still by their own choice.
I think the consensus among most is that Paul gives permission for the young widows to remarry and by virtue of silence doesn't extend the same to older widows.
Having married an older widow within the last 7 months, I have zero concept of the consensus of which you speak.I think the consensus among most is that Paul gives permission for the young widows to remarry and by virtue of silence doesn't extend the same to older widows.
I will maintain that it is completely reasonable for women to approach married men, but in reality it would probably be more comfortable to return to the grade school model.In my original comment to your post I was attempting to press the question at hand regarding singles approaching married men. Hoping this helps without further confusion.
Paul is NOT GIVING PERMISSION. He doesn't need to. All widows are already permitted to marry, have always been, this is never forbidden anywhere in scripture.I think the consensus among most is that Paul gives permission for the young widows to remarry and by virtue of silence doesn't extend the same to older widows.
Having married an older widow within the last 7 months, I have zero concept of the consensus of which you speak.
You might be using the tradition of some men to read into Scripture what I cannot see.