This thread holds some very interesting comments to say the least coming from quite a range of vantage points.
Back about 17 years ago, Elohim laid down a prominent "wisdom-marker" in my life with Ecc. 7:18...
At the time I was learning some powerful truths relating to living by Faith and starting to have a discomfort with perhaps stepping into the extremes that I had observed in the lives of others. The translation of the verse that I had at the time ended with these words "a wise man will avoid all extremes"
The Holy Spirit spoke to me in my heart as a small river of flowing thought the following...
A wise man will avoid all extremes, even the extreme of going to the extreme avoiding extremes. Is not a mere walk, a constant state of imbalance. If you fear one step the next will never follow.
I really like "The Scriptures" translation of this verse...
"It is good that you should take hold of this, and also not withhold your hand from the other. For he who fears Elohim comes forth with all of them."
All too often our "balance" can rather be uniform weakness in all areas and the pursuit of "balance" a settling into the calm "eye" of ones comfort zone thus creating "peace from the storm" of truth.
I believe that "monogamy-insistent" wives' "natural" objections to YHWH's intentions for marriage are truly natural but only in the sense that they are the typical behavioral outworkings in the context of the complex labyrinth of inculturated strongholds. Selah.
Note: Not to imply that circumstantial singular marriage is not a fully sanctioned option in that broader intention.
It is not only a good idea but really quite vital that we allow and actively desire (husbands also in all areas of truth) the strongholds of the enemy to be torn down. When significant progress is made in the uprooting of lies and effective replacement of the truth, attitudes truly change from the very depths and emotions follow quite predictably.
This is the spectrum of response in my view... (practically though perhaps not technically accurate)
Active Rebellion = outward acts of resistance and inward distrust and anger
Passive Resistance = outward submission and inward resistance
Submission = outward alignment and inward disagreement
Alignment = outward unity and inward questions
Unity = outward unity and inward unity
(At least this is the understanding that I received relating to the matter, perhaps you see in another way.)
The submission level is a dangerous place to be for it is often actually just passive resistance that is putting on a good show or at least allows for the festering of internal discontent if commitment wanes or is frustrated. In my view, a husband should not "go for" submission but true unity with his wife, lest the relational foundation provide place for the enemy.
Please don't interpret any of the above as my recommending allowing the wife to lead. When you allow that in a marriage, by law of necessity, deceiving and manipulative spirits will be attracted to the vacuum created by the role disparity. Choosing to slow down your rate of travel or even taking a break in sensitivity to others does not automatically imply abdication of leadership.
Think Jacob and his family and flocks. Ecc. 7:18 He lead his family and was mindful of the dangers of "driving then hard". Gen. 33:13-14
Sincerely,
Curtis
Back about 17 years ago, Elohim laid down a prominent "wisdom-marker" in my life with Ecc. 7:18...
At the time I was learning some powerful truths relating to living by Faith and starting to have a discomfort with perhaps stepping into the extremes that I had observed in the lives of others. The translation of the verse that I had at the time ended with these words "a wise man will avoid all extremes"
The Holy Spirit spoke to me in my heart as a small river of flowing thought the following...
A wise man will avoid all extremes, even the extreme of going to the extreme avoiding extremes. Is not a mere walk, a constant state of imbalance. If you fear one step the next will never follow.
I really like "The Scriptures" translation of this verse...
"It is good that you should take hold of this, and also not withhold your hand from the other. For he who fears Elohim comes forth with all of them."
All too often our "balance" can rather be uniform weakness in all areas and the pursuit of "balance" a settling into the calm "eye" of ones comfort zone thus creating "peace from the storm" of truth.
I believe that "monogamy-insistent" wives' "natural" objections to YHWH's intentions for marriage are truly natural but only in the sense that they are the typical behavioral outworkings in the context of the complex labyrinth of inculturated strongholds. Selah.
Note: Not to imply that circumstantial singular marriage is not a fully sanctioned option in that broader intention.
It is not only a good idea but really quite vital that we allow and actively desire (husbands also in all areas of truth) the strongholds of the enemy to be torn down. When significant progress is made in the uprooting of lies and effective replacement of the truth, attitudes truly change from the very depths and emotions follow quite predictably.
This is the spectrum of response in my view... (practically though perhaps not technically accurate)
Active Rebellion = outward acts of resistance and inward distrust and anger
Passive Resistance = outward submission and inward resistance
Submission = outward alignment and inward disagreement
Alignment = outward unity and inward questions
Unity = outward unity and inward unity
(At least this is the understanding that I received relating to the matter, perhaps you see in another way.)
The submission level is a dangerous place to be for it is often actually just passive resistance that is putting on a good show or at least allows for the festering of internal discontent if commitment wanes or is frustrated. In my view, a husband should not "go for" submission but true unity with his wife, lest the relational foundation provide place for the enemy.
Please don't interpret any of the above as my recommending allowing the wife to lead. When you allow that in a marriage, by law of necessity, deceiving and manipulative spirits will be attracted to the vacuum created by the role disparity. Choosing to slow down your rate of travel or even taking a break in sensitivity to others does not automatically imply abdication of leadership.
Think Jacob and his family and flocks. Ecc. 7:18 He lead his family and was mindful of the dangers of "driving then hard". Gen. 33:13-14
Sincerely,
Curtis