Horowitz: The sudden decline in birth rates post-vaccination — and the shocking silence

[theleastofthese]

This is why you need to try to actually understand what is REAALLLY going on.

This is also why you need to not speak in riddles so often. It's difficult to trust what you're actually referencing and the context. With you, "chickens" could mean birds or it could mean space aliens.

There waa a documentary years ago called farmageddon. It was largely about the attrocities commited by the ef dee aye against farmers and raw milk producers. They say your animals are diseased and other labs won't even test for you.
It's all about control and monopoly for large producers.

I've seen a few similar documentaries

 

[Mark C]

This is also why you need to not speak in riddles so often. It's difficult to trust what you're actually referencing and the context.

Some time ago, I gave you a number of unimpeachable sources documenting the level of 'federal' involvement in both the development of the bioweapon(s) and the coordinated propaganda to promote, and then cover-up the deadly results. (RFK, Jr.'s "The Real Anthony Fauci," and Dr. Pierre Kory's, "The War on Ivermectin." The latest H5N1actions post-date that.)

Although you said you'd look at them, at least, and hopefully read both, and I gave you the 'benefit of the doubt' -- it's very obvious that you didn't even peruse the Tables of Contents. Why do I know? Because you'd BE MAD AS HELL. To realize that you were being "deceived unto death," by intention, tends to do that.

 

[paterfamilias]

No, I think Samuel has missed his own point. He and other men on here are more than willing to openly discuss the potential (by his own admission) damage that the vaccinated may cause those around us. While actively taking part in things themselves that have been extensively proven to cause health issues. Give me a break.

Apparently coming to this late or I am a bit thick...what are people actively taking part in that a proven to cause health issues?

 

[Mark C]

I think it's anything BUT that Zyklon-B injection, @paterfamilias...

 

[theleastofthese]

Because you'd BE MAD AS HELL. To realize that you were being "deceived unto death," by intention, tends to do that.

Well, unlike you, my emotional range and very identity aren't centered around feeling as though everyone is out to get me.

PS- I actually didn't "read" the book, I used the audio version. I listened to it with a friend who is far more pro-vax than I will ever be, we both found it fascinating, just happened to research further into counter-explanations/theories, as I do with most things. Although admittedly it ruins the fun of conspiracy theories.

 

[paterfamilias]

I think it's anything BUT that Zyklon-B injection, @paterfamilias...

No clue. Figured it was easier to ask for explicit clarification than go back and reread the whole thread.

Also not so sure about the fat old guys bit either.
As a guy who used to be obese but who will happily take the mat with any three 25 year old guys off the street now as my fitness journey has progressed, I am not sure about how to take the critique beyond

 

[theleastofthese]

Also not so sure about the fat old guys bit either.
As a guy who used to be obese but who will happily take the mat with any three 25 year old guys off the street now as my fitness journey has progressed, I am not sure about how to take the critique beyond

My comments were directed specifically towards those who hold a holier-than-thou attitude towards the vaccinated. I'm not a thin person myself but if I ever had the audacity to accuse others of taking a suicidal poison poke, of being mutants, of being martial red flags, while endangering the health of their families as well as my own, i'd make dang sure I was a picture of perfection myself first.

 

[paterfamilias]

My comments were directed specifically towards those who hold a holier-than-thou attitude towards the vaccinated. I'm not a thin person myself but if I ever had the audacity to accuse others of taking a suicidal poison poke, of being mutants, of being martial red flags, of endangering the health of their family and my own, i'd make dang sure I was a picture of perfection myself first.

I am not sure how that follows.

Walk with me for a moment on an analogy.
I have simply horrible handwriting. Everyone in my family seems to be a nexus where all bad handwriting collected in an effort to hold back the forces of legibility.
Unsurprisingly the family is full of doctors. Not sure if this is a chicken and egg conundrum or just a coincidence. Who knows.
Now, with my bona fides established, as a person with poor hand writing, should I not ask someone to make an effort to be more legible when at the whiteboard making a presentation if I am unable to read what they wrote?

It also occurs to me that people have far more mundane criteria than the shots for not considering the notion of pairing with a potential suitor and have had since before any of our time.
Being obese is a great example as is age, income/assets, hair colour for some, race and religion certainly, political beliefs, disability, comparative intelligence...the list could get silly long.

So I am not sure how adding new potential factors makes the overall issue any different beyond simple accelerationism on a already well trodden path.

Part of the issue to my mind is the double edged sword of modern western world living.
We are high tech and comfortable enough to not need to pair off based upon factors like trading between tribes/villages or bride price/dowry or simply can he work the land and will she work beside me and the like.

Those who see the covid shots as a significant sea change are simply taking on from one point of view, a new bit of criteria that helps to pidgin hole whether this is a potential mate or not. In the case of men, I would have thought that it still doesn't put them on par with the number of disqualifying traits that pop culture tells us woman use to parse out men.
Not a man v woman thing, simply that woman are the sexual and by extension reproductive gatekeepers in these modern times and by extension are far more able to be parsimonious.


Thoughts?

 

[Mark C]

Thoughts?

I would simply never date a smoker. And I recognize that's less damaging, and less harmful to others, than being/having re-worked DNA to produce spike proteins. Sorry. Facts are pesky things.

But I have not seen many (OK, any, over the age of 16) smokers who would try to convince others to take up an addiction virtually every single one of them regret for themselves.

Well, unlike you, my emotional range and very identity aren't centered around feeling as though everyone is out to get me.

They're not. Sorry to burst your bubble.

PS- I actually didn't "read" the book, I used the audio version. I listened to it with a friend who is far more pro-vax than I will ever be, we both found it fascinating, just happened to research further into counter-explanations/theories, as I do with most things. Although admittedly it ruins the fun of conspiracy theories.

Which? They cover entirely different aspects of that conspiracy to ultimately kill billions.

 

[paterfamilias]

I would simply never date a smoker. And I recognize that's less damaging, and less harmful to others, than being having re-worked DNA to produce spike proteins. Sorry. Facts are pesky things.

But I have not seen many (OK, any, over the age of 16) smokers who would try to convince others to take up an addiction virtually every single one of them regret for themselves.



They're not. Sorry to burst your bubble.


Which? They cover entirely different aspects of that conspiracy to ultimately kill billions.

Looks like you are agreeing with me that the shots are just a new criteria that is part of living in this modern world when it comes to mate selection.

Not fond of what times are to come but I can't say that anything about modernity makes me not wish for a new Byzantium hideaway.

 

[theleastofthese]

@paterfamilias- Asking someone to write better so you can understand something implies a shared, objective goal. You're not about judging the person's character and worth. Imagine if you started telling the person holding the presentation that you're not going to reproduce with them because you can't read their handwriting. What sort of reaction would you expect from them? Surely they'd fire back with something along the lines of "well dude your handwriting sucks too" and on top of that "you most likely can't read well." "Perhaps I wouldn't want to reproduce with you either."

Using someone's vaccination status to make unfounded accusations regarding intelligence, ability to critically think, or moral motives goes beyond preferring brunettes over blondes. (I don't know why anyone would, I'm biased though).

Anyway, you're right humans have always used various preferences to chose who they sleep with for centuries. My problem is that, this, like many of those preferences has become a social divide that creates distrust of the vaccinated and reduces them from actual people to symbols of something more sinister.

Are y'all even filtering ladies out because they're worthy of being filtered out or are you leading with accusations and assumptions prior to any real engagement with them.

And when does this stop??? How many young ladies have probably taken the vaccine at the direction of their parents? Imagine girl's my nieces age or your daughter's ages, who will look to marry and have children in the future. Having to deal with being told things like this due to something they really weren't even old enough to make an informed decision about, by cranky old miserable men who use it at means to feel better about themselves. It's absolutely childish.