I do agree some things can be 100% medically necessary and unavoidable! I’m so sorry to hear about you and your families endometriosis! I have a close friend who has it pretty bad as well so I know how that can impact peoples lives immensely, and I understand how medical treatments can literally be life-saving. I just try to be more conscious in what I buy into, and I’m sorry if my post came off as very negative!
-
Biblical Families is not a dating website. It is a forum to discuss issues relating to marriage and the Bible, and to offer guidance and support, not to find a wife. Click here for more information.
Horowitz: The sudden decline in birth rates post-vaccination — and the shocking silence
- Status
It didn't
I was just sharing that we all made decisions based on what we knew at the time or because we didn't have much of a choice based on health reasons, and that's ok. I feel bad that you regret being pressured, I don't think that should happen to anyone under any circumstance. I certainly agree that we should be more cautious of everything. I just feel that should go for both sides of the coin.Just crushing the hearts of millions of young, fertile women in their prime...It's true, they should be concerned about falsely creating a link. It may instead be that men are choosing to NOT procreate with the vaxxed. They may be using that as a screening mechanism.
This is truth. Every road has two ditches and the trick is to stay out of either of them.
Some of us may be no more distrustful than you, but we've learned to more skeptical of promises made by people who have a financial interest in the miracle cures they are promoting.
Having a wife who is a doctor I am fully aware of the difference quality medical interventions can bring. It also means I'm equally aware of some of the corruption and deceit used by unethical practitioners to manipulate needy people into receiving treatments that temporarily address the symptoms but don't cure the problem. One of the most memorable examples I can recall is an American man who saw my wife while on vacation here who needed treatment for a problem he'd had for many years. When she asked him why he was using a certain medication, he said that's what his doctor had recommended. Apparently, his doctor told him the problem could not be fully cured, only treated with expensive medications to relieve the symptoms. She treated the problem with inexpensive generic drugs, and two weeks later, when he returned to the USA, he was fully cured. Deceit, with offers of amazing benefits, began in the Garden and has successfully been used to suck people into all sorts of scams. A simple lesson, be more skeptical than Eve was.
Because of the increases in medical problems people post-vax are having we are getting richer! And the more shots they get, the more problems. Wahoo, thank you doctor Fauci
. It's very sad to encounter younger and younger people with medical conditions typically associated with older age. That's the new reality. The problems are diverse and getting worse as the Czech research into declining fertility rates points out.Which is why God tells us to be wise and discerning and not fools lead away like Eve was. Test all things (1 Thes. 5:21). Cheers
In my late teens, I went to school for medical coding and medical assistant. I had no reason to doubt the medical field at that point, and I remember the first thing I found strange was the pharma reps coming into the doctor's offices with all sorts of gift baskets and fancy catering foods in attempt to get the doctors to agree to meet with them in order to discuss new medications. I've obviously seen worse things since, but even in my naive state of mind at that time, I knew something was just wrong about what they were doing. I even asked the nurses around me what was going on, and they were like, "Yeah, they're just peddling new drugs, they want the doctors to prescribe them more." They were excited because for them it was a good way to receive free gifts and food from the pharma reps.Some of us may be no more distrustful than you, but we've learned to more skeptical of promises made by people who have a financial interest in the miracle cures they are promoting.
Having a wife who is a doctor I am fully aware of the difference quality medical interventions can bring. It also means I'm equally aware of some of the corruption and deceit used by unethical practitioners to manipulate needy people into receiving treatments that temporarily address the symptoms but don't cure the problem. One of the most memorable examples I can recall is an American man who saw my wife while on vacation here who needed treatment for a problem he'd had for many years. When she asked him why he was using a certain medication, he said that's what his doctor had recommended. Apparently, his doctor told him the problem could not be fully cured, only treated with expensive medications to relieve the symptoms. She treated the problem with inexpensive generic drugs, and two weeks later, when he returned to the USA, he was fully cured. Deceit, with offers of amazing benefits, began in the Garden and has successfully been used to suck people into all sorts of scams. A simple lesson, be more skeptical than Eve was.
Because of the increases in medical problems people post-vax are having we are getting richer! And the more shots they get, the more problems. Wahoo, thank you doctor Fauci
Which is why God tells us to be wise and discerning and not fools lead away like Eve was. Test all things (1 Thes. 5:21). Cheers
That's a good point. It's a very cultural issue. A survey very early on showed the strongest supporters of vaccines were those who were moderately college educated with undergrad degrees, ie those already most indoctrinated to "trust the experts", while the most likely to object were those who had either no education past high school (those who retained some healthy distrust of experts) and the most highly educated (those with PhDs).
In society, it is those college-educated women who have the lowest birth rates - they are more likely to be pursuing careers - and the non college educated who have the most children.
So you're right. If this were only about a difference in birth rate between the vaccinated and unvaccinated, that alone could be just a demographic issue.
However if the overall birth rate in the population has declined, that cannot be explained this way, and would mean the vaccines had actually harmed fertility. And I believe the statistics clearly show this also.
It's reality though. I would be very reluctant to sleep with a vaccinated woman, because there have been many reports from very early on of spike protein transfer between sexual partners or even other family members. I would not want to risk my health nor that of my wife and children. In the same way, I wouldn't want a blood transfusion from a vaccinated person if I could possibly avoid it. It's not fair, but it's reality. We simply don't know what's going on yet and the research that is needed to answer these questions is not being done for political reasons. Until we know more we have to be cautious.
This is not just a vaccine, it is a gene therapy that was intentionally designed to genetically modify the recipients to produce parts of a harmful virus, in the hope of generating an immune response. If this does turn out to be a disaster, it may be that the only way out is to breed those damaged genes out of the population by selectively breeding with those who are unvaccinated.
This is a very sad situation and we probably don't realize how sad it is yet.
So you live a perfectly healthy lifestyle otherwise?
No. And that's not the point, it's not about lifestyle. It's about transmissible disease. I have to protect my wife and children.
Consider a different example. If I were single I'd consider marrying a woman with an STD, as it would only affect me. But as I already have a wife I cannot marry a second who would introduce a disease that would harm her also. My priority must be the welfare of my existing wife.
There are reasons to suspect that this vaccine may be transmissible, that it may function as an STD, and the negative effects of it may be passed on through sex. This is by no means certain, I am not claiming it is true, just there are many reasons to suspect it. Which means we need research to either verify or allay these concerns. Until that research is conducted those of us who have not yet been contaminated by it must take a precautionary approach. It's the sad reality. And that research is not being conducted, so we may need to be cautious for a very long time.
Look what the powers that be have done, tearing us apart like this. It's sick.
Consider a different example. If I were single I'd consider marrying a woman with an STD, as it would only affect me. But as I already have a wife I cannot marry a second who would introduce a disease that would harm her also. My priority must be the welfare of my existing wife.
There are reasons to suspect that this vaccine may be transmissible, that it may function as an STD, and the negative effects of it may be passed on through sex. This is by no means certain, I am not claiming it is true, just there are many reasons to suspect it. Which means we need research to either verify or allay these concerns. Until that research is conducted those of us who have not yet been contaminated by it must take a precautionary approach. It's the sad reality. And that research is not being conducted, so we may need to be cautious for a very long time.
Look what the powers that be have done, tearing us apart like this. It's sick.
It should be... If you hold yourself to such high esteem regarding health standards and protecting your family, it should apply to all situations. Not only to make-believe, unlikely scenarios in which you have the option to sleep with young, fertile, vaccinated women to begin with. You're more likely to become ill due to obesity first, yet seemingly far less concerned about that.
Last edited:
That could be the case in a thin slice of the population but I would be very surprised if it more than a small percentage even in those who know the truthIt's true, they should be concerned about falsely creating a link. It may instead be that men are choosing to NOT procreate with the vaxxed. They may be using that as a screening mechanism.
So you geniuses have decided that it's best to counter the declining birth rate that you incessantly whine about by refusing to breed with like 60% of the female population. Considering the fact that there most likely won't be younger, fertile ladies lining up to wed already married 50+ year old men anytime soon- You're essentially leaving the breeding up to the vaccinated.
You say that like it’s a bad thing.
I mean...it's not bad for people like me. Seems a bit counterproductive to your own argument though...
I think you've missed the point Samuel is trying to make. We need to see evidence about this GMO to enable us to make wise decisions about matters that will affect our wives and children. None of us want to make hasty decisions that could have a devastating impact on those we are responsible for. And I've seen and heard enough to make me very cautious about the covid drugs and their long-term effects.
As Samuel has said,
Here is a quote from a 22 June 2023 article in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences:
"Post-marketing studies have shown that mRNA passes into breast milk and could have adverse effects on breast-fed babies. Long-term expression, integration into the genome, transmission to the germline, passage into sperm, embryo/fetal and perinatal toxicity, genotoxicity and tumorigenicity should be studied in light of the adverse events reported in pharmacovigilance databases. The potential horizontal transmission (i.e., shedding) should also have been assessed. In-depth vaccinovigilance should be carried out."
You can read more here: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10342157/
No, I think Samuel has missed his own point. He and other men on here are more than willing to openly discuss the potential (by his own admission) damage that the vaccinated may cause those around us. While actively taking part in things themselves that have been extensively proven to cause health issues. Give me a break.
Last edited:
Truly 'scientific' studies (with actual, non-bought-and-paid-for) peer review will control for such variables. (Often, it's a 'meta-analyis' of multiple papers and studies.) But this is also the reason why broad-based statistical measures are informative (as was "all-cause mortality").
A six- or ten-sigma event will stand out, and be undeniable (except to the Totally Blue-Pilled.)
Last edited:
If that's true, it means the eugenicists have already won.
Thankfully, I think it's just more Ministry of Truth propaganda.
- Status