Good afternoon,
@LovesDogs!
I don't know if you've read all of this thread or even the various other threads focusing on online dating, but I agree with what
@cnystrom wrote about the superiority of the now-pretty-much-nonexistent message boards, but even they were inferior to the personals ads that preexisted them (some technological advances are not progress). I put a great deal of energy into dating sites (Ashley Madison, OK Cupid, POF, Zooks and sisterwives), but my first major reaction to them was to switch to being more of an observational social scientist than a participant, and all that happened over time with participation and exposure was to become increasingly cynical.
@JimC met his wife on a dating site, and the fact that, very occasionally, we can point to the rare people who have formed excellent relationships that way causes most of us to continue to stoke up our
hope, but I would assert that, in regard to where time will be best-spent, the successes are most certainly the
exceptions to the rule, which is to say that dating sites are predominantly a waste of time other than to keep us engaged in fantasy.
sisterwives is no exception. I'm very disappointed by the owners. It does appear that they started out with good intentions, but in the end they opted for maximizing profit, and they cynically engage in numerous shady practices, including hiring women to pretend to be available -- and covertly flooding one's In Box when renewal time is approaching to ramp up that hope factor just long enough to get the credit card information once again.
I don't know if it's the dating sites, though, that are to blame for their general lack of success when it comes to forming long-term relationships. Our culture has changed, and it's simply the case that most people have become comfortable in their relative isolation, and the majority who date online are doing so at places like Tinder for the sole purpose of finding people with whom they can have entirely casual sex. This has resulted in the non-hookup sites being over-represented by women who have incredibly unrealistic expectations of who they're seeking and even more ridiculous exaggeration of their worth in the Sexual Marketplace.
On sisterwives, unless one just gets off on repeatedly beating one's head against the wall, the numbers just operate almost entirely against anyone looking for a long-term relationship based on biblical principles. A large minority percentage of the profiles are fake, and at least 80% of the real people there are polyamorists (swingers, etc.) who are predominantly looking for young women to use as playthings and then discard like toilet paper (the analogy I prefer is that polyamorists are looking for human cruise ships they can board, engorge themselves thereon and then disembark with no residual sense of responsibility). Most of the remaining people are men who already have a wife but want more. Just visit the New Member function on a daily basis, and what I'm asserting becomes obvious. Every day there are 1 or 2 or 3 new single women, but even among those who are
real single women, they are being
deluged with approaches by the majority of those plural men --
and being just as deluged by the much larger number of men and women looking for polyamory playthings, and the latter are offering enough more-tempting opportunities for the moment than most of the men who are looking for a permanent 2nd or 3rd (trips, etc., and don't forget that, over the age of 30, the most common expressed desire in a woman's dating profile is travel -- that you'll pay for; being courted with the enticement of an off-the-grid life of homesteading in the desert simply isn't going to be as glamorous).
As a woman on sisterwives, you no doubt received a lot of attention from men. If you aren't looking for patriarchy, you should definitely be able to find a plethora of men (and women) eager to consider you for hooking up with you, and the hooking up may not be just for the weekend, but it will rarely be permanent, because the non-patriarchal men simply aren't looking to take long-term responsibility for a woman. Unfortunately, most of the mutual-submission non-polyamorist men are already taken (i.e., they're married), so the unmarried ones probably receive as much attention online as the hot single babes. What's left are men who are working as hard as they can to implement biblical headship, but that means they will expect acquiescence to the dynamics of the patriarchy/submission dance -- and you can interact with the majority of
those men right here on biblicalfamilies.org. (If you think I'm kidding, at any given moment check out who has been online at sisterwives most recently, and it's extremely rare that you won't see 2 or 3 Biblical Families men on the first page of results.)
My advice to you is no different from my advice to everyone else if one is set on following the dating site fantasy: be as thoroughly honest and forthright as one can be
from the very beginning. Put exactly what you want in your first sentence, and start being entirely transparent about yourself in your second sentence. Don't hold back, figuring you'll introduce who you are or what you're really up to as you get to know someone. It's
disrespectful to take that approach, and one only fools oneself with the canard that one doesn't want to scare someone off too prematurely. After all, we are talking about someone with whom one is going to have a permanent relationship, and that should be characterized by a full measure of love and obedience to Yah and Yeshua
from the beginning. How often would any of us as individuals assert that the way
we would want to be treated is to have vital information withheld until after emotional investment had already begun to be established?
Lastly -- and this is also an
of course -- in order to effectively describe oneself accurately, one has to start with being honest with oneself, which includes knowing one's weaknesses as well as one's strengths, and, by necessity, requires an ability to describe just what it is one brings to the table beyond sexual equipment that will make one stand out among the crowds of those who also have the same sexual equipment.