I really get the vibe that these women are not actually looking for plural marriage or any marriage frankly.
I can't disagree with that. When they are, they're looking for Mr. Impossible, who is already married to someone with 10 times their value in the marketplace of women. And when they're
not looking for marriage, the reasons are plentiful, so it's difficult to sort through them. You've mentioned some of the clues, but then it's still hard to know if, "I am terrible at talking about myself lol" is code for "I'm just here to find kinky sex partners," or, "I'm just too damned lazy to write anything," or, "I'm looking to scam you out of cash or steal your identity."
they have a perceived high market value because they are female.
Perceived is the key word here: on regular dating sites, the women far outnumber the men, just like they do in the real world; on the polygamy sites, instead of the women being the largest category, the polyamorous (swinging) couples outnumber everyone else combined, with single males coming second, which would put any
sincere woman looking to be a second wife in the catbird's seat.
Is it crazy to think that the family being honest about their desire to be in a plural capital M Marriage...both husband and wife... and being at least decent people who are what they claim in a profile is as high market value wise as the single woman seeking her new family and husband?
It's not crazy, nor is it inaccurate, but it's naive to believe that the people populating the clientele of the dating sites will recognize that you're high value. Not to beat a dead horse, but feminism has so fully infiltrated even many of the most vigilant among us who claim not to be feminist that, to the average person, polygamists seeking additional wives just come across as desperate losers. Misfits. The unpopular. When it comes down to it, too, most of the single women who are available are women who have divorced their previous husbands for insufficient reasons. They're motivation was to trade
UP, and trading into a 2nd-wife position is culturally most definitely a trading-down proposition. We may know that is not the case, but even if we could take full charge of the public education system in America and promote what we know about Biblical polygamy every day of the week at all grade levels, it would probably take 30 or 40 years to convince the majority of people that it's even acceptable. Enlightenment isn't going to do the trick. People are going to have to actually
see that people are doing it and that it can really work well -- and, for a variety of reasons, almost all polygamists are operating in hiding, some out of realistic fears, but most out of an unwillingness to take on any social stigma. Seeking popularity is a very strong human motivator.
when women were clearly not acting in good faith.
I suppose I may have just used the phrase that solidifies in my minds eye what I am thinking. I don't know that there is a particularly high percentage of single women and for that matter couples on the polygamy dating sites who are acting in good faith. Yeah...that probably sums it up.
Agreed.
The big question though is how to navigate the process without becoming too black pilled by the process? Wheat from chaff sort of thing...
Not that obstacles should stop one mind you, just venting a bit.
Having lived plural marriage and having become a father in the last few years I can not imagine not trying to go forward with the effort to find another wife to love or to have more children.
I've written this before, but maybe it bears repeating for potential new readers: I started out on Ashley Madison, and perhaps the closest I came to finding a partner was from that site. Almost everyone was friendly, and they didn't get bent out of shape because I wasn't seeking an affair; instead I got a lot of interest, because many of them were seeking affairs only because they were frustrated with trying to find a permanent partner. From there I moved on to Plenty of Fish and OK Cupid. Lots and lots of interaction over many years, and there were potentials, but I eventually decided I had to get away from it. Recently, I have been doing 'field research' by having a profile on Zoosk and posting the play-by-play of much of it here in my Intro III thread. Personally, I'm probably now always consider it to be an invaluable exercise -- because I've found my most recent ex-wife (from 36 years ago) -- and I've always been able to maintain a nonchalant attitude about it, because my expectations going in were quite low, but it hasn't changed my mind about whether or not it's generally a worthwhile endeavor.
Generally speaking, it's just not. Not that sparks don't sometimes fly from online dating, but of all of the very many plural families I know, very few met anonymously. Almost all of them met each other during the normal course of their lives, and the vast majority didn't meet each other in the context of seeking a wife. Other very real life relationships turned into romantic ones. It's just like blind dates. They strike gold just often enough to remain in the positive mythological category, but mostly they fall flat. Add online to that, and now you're dealing with the majority being people who are conducting some type of grift.
But, even without tangible success, there is one possible other benefit to being involved on an online dating site: it keeps one's juices flowing in the direction of fantasizing about possibilities. Women do show interest, albeit almost always because they haven't really read one's profile. But, hey, I now have 48 fake flower arrangements that have been gifted to me -- and the senders had to pay real money to have those fake arrangements delivered my way (the fake aroma is out of this world!). Again, though, almost every time I've reached out to such senders to thank them, I get informed that, "I sent you that before I found out you were already married . . ."