Exodus 2:24. Exodus 6:5
Making one covenant doesn’t necessarily void the previous covenant... obviously God kept his covenant with Abraham while continuing on to make a covenant with Isaac and Jacob ...
Seems relevant to poly as well...
Exodus 2:24. Exodus 6:5
Making one covenant doesn’t necessarily void the previous covenant... obviously God kept his covenant with Abraham while continuing on to make a covenant with Isaac and Jacob ...
I thought we were talking about marriage.The Israelites were God's chosen people long before Sinai
Sorry @ZecAustin Sinai is clearly the covenant. Jeremiah 31:31-34... comparing old and new, husband to them....During the Alaskan gold rush there were people who were buying "mines" sight unseen from thousands of miles away. Those people would be ashamed to speculate as much as you just did. I've seen some pretty big assumptions but we might have to capitalize that one. If we added a little musical score we could combine it with all the tap dancing you did to get there and we could put on a show: Assumption! The Musical!
The Israelites were God's chosen people long before Sinai.
Ezekiel 16:8 is more on my side. Spreading His cloak over her and covering her nakedness are euphemisms for sex.
During the Alaskan gold rush there were people who were buying "mines" sight unseen from thousands of miles away. Those people would be ashamed to speculate as much as you just did. I've seen some pretty big assumptions but we might have to capitalize that one. If we added a little musical score we could combine it with all the tap dancing you did to get there and we could put on a show: Assumption! The Musical!
The Israelites were God's chosen people long before Sinai.
Zackly!Very helpful thoughts. Your response helped give me a clearer view of why Jesus does not speak highly of "putting away" a wife. Putting someone away seems to be devoid of all four types of love. I can see why Jesus described it as a hard hearted thing to do.
I would be careful of stretching this metaphor too far. We know that God described Himself as married to Israel and we know that God made a covenant with Israel. It doesn't necessarily follow.that God married Israel by a covenant. Job made a covenant with his eyes. I don't think you would say Job was married to his eyes.I thought we were talking about marriage.
When would you surmise that this marriage happened?
So what was all that stuff He said to Abraham and Jacob? Quite a bit of that sounded very covenanty and applied to future generations. I would be loathe to draw a hard line at Sinai.Sorry @ZecAustin Sinai is clearly the covenant. Jeremiah 31:31-34... comparing old and new, husband to them....
Indeed, Israel was His before then, like a betrothed little girl until her coming of age. But, the covenant happened at Sinai and it was both written and spoken... 'all that You say, we will do...'
It is fun to watch you battle with this, though....
I don't rely on the Ezekiel passage. I just pointed out that it supports my belief.If you depend on Ez 16:8 then you'd have to say that marriage formation requires a covenant AND sex. But notice what that passage doesn't include: dowry. Which other passages on marriage do include. So we can't take this verse as all encompassing or definitive.
Chosen people != covenant. Was not the law a covenant? That's why we call it the Old Law. I didn't realize that was controversial.
Paulsen is right, there was a covenant made between God and Abraham. But that doesn't mean there wouldn't be subsequent ones.
POoOW!! Spot on!The exact phrase is
What? know ye not that he which is joined to an harlot is one body? for two, saith he, shall be one†flesh
The Greek word there is kollao which is interchangeable with proskollao both of which are always used in scripture to indicate an alliance, or bonding of some sort like marriage and are never used to indicate a sexual “joining”. That is reserved for words/situations like fornication/adultery etc.
Your assumption that sex with a harlot equals “joining” is a conflation of ideas and words. It is true that you can have sex with a harlot, and it is also true that you can marry a harlot. But having sex with a harlot equals fornication unless you have also “kallao’ed” her.
POoOWWWWWW! Then compare that to Genesis 2:24’s cleave in the Hebrew to expound on.John 4:16-18
Jesus saith unto her, Go, call thy husband, and come hither.
The woman answered and said, I have (echo Strongs 2192) no husband. Jesus said unto her, Thou hast well said,†I have (echo) no husband:
For thou hast had (echo) five husbands; and he whom thou now hast (echo) is not thy husband: in that sadist thou truly.
Echo. Strongs 2192.
So in plain 21st century English, she says that she is not presently joined to a husband. Jesus confirms that this is her present reality though she has been joined to five men who were her husband (presumably sequentially) and they are currently no longer joined to her. The sixth man that she is currently “echo” ed to is not her husband as she said. The remarkable thing here is that Christ said that she spoke truly about her current status. Echo’ed but without a husband.
- to hold one's self to a thing, to lay hold of a thing, to adhere or cling to
- to be closely joined to a person or a thing
I don't rely on the Ezekiel passage. I just pointed out that it supports my belief.
You raise a good point when you said that the passage doesn't include a dowry so that it must not be a complete teaching on marriage. This is an excellent standard for you to apply to this topic. You should go through all of the verses about marriage and catalog what features in everyone. Then we could see what elements are universal in Biblical marriages and so what would then constitute one.
I can give you the answer if you like but you seem like the sort who has to find things for himself. So look it up, what is the one common element in every depiction of marriage in the Bible? There aren't that many passages so it won't take you long.
@all
When you say 'marriage is a covenant', what do you mean? How do you define those words? Are you saying it is formed with the forming of the covenant? If so, how is that covenant formed and what are the specifics of it?
I ask because I realized today that 'marriage is a covenant', though a nice statement I often hear brandied about, is rarely defined and for those from a Reformed background may carry a lot of unspecified theological implications.
So I guess I’m saying that the “agreement” starts it... and is the covenant.
Ya. I usually view covenant as a synonym for agreement or contract. But I get the impression that to some it has more implications than that practical level of meaning.
If you depend on Ez 16:8 then you'd have to say that marriage formation requires a covenant AND sex. But notice what that passage doesn't include: dowry.
And on what basis can you say that something that's a never mentioned element is? Because a covenant is a never mentioned element. At least not in the formation of a one flesh relationship. Sex always is though. It's not quite that simple but it almost is. Part of the problem is that we've invented this term marriage that doesn't exist in the Bible. Neither do the terms husband or wife. The Bible only refers to men and the women they've mastered. Yes, you can make a covenant with a woman you've mastered if you like. It's not necessary though.And on what basis can we say that a one, always mentioned element, is therefore the ONLY one that constitutes marriage?
A 'marriage' that does not bring light to God (eventually) is not a marriage by design.
And on what basis can you say that something that's a never mentioned element is? Because a covenant is a never mentioned element. At least not in the formation of a one flesh relationship. Sex always is though. It's not quite that simple but it almost is. Part of the problem is that we've invented this term marriage that doesn't exist in the Bible. Neither do the terms husband or wife. The Bible only refers to men and the women they've mastered. Yes, you can make a covenant with a woman you've mastered if you like. It's not necessary though.