Horowitz: The sudden decline in birth rates post-vaccination — and the shocking silence

[Maddog]

Truly 'scientific' studies (with actual, non-bought-and-paid-for) peer review will control for such variables. (Often, it's a 'meta-analyis' of multiple papers and studies.) But this is also the reason why broad-based statistical measures are informative (as was "all-cause mortality").

A six- or ten-sigma even will stand out, and be undeniable (except to the Totally Blue-Pilled.)

Which requires research.

 

[Mark C]

No, I think Samuel has missed his own point. He and other men on here are more than willing to openly discuss the potential (by his own admission) damage that the vaccinated may cause those around us. While actively taking part in things themselves that have been extensively proven to cause health issues. Give me a break.

Free people make choices. Get used to it, because the Fauci ForceFeed has (hopefully) failed.

Those of us who have seen the level of evil involved in the last Plandemic will simply NOT let it happen to US again.

And I now know enough about spike shedding that I not only don't want to sleep with any, I choose not to even spend any more time in their presence than possible. (I don't like to be around smokers, either...but it's demonstrably less harmful, whether the duped admit it YET or not.)

 

[Mark C]

Which requires research.

Actually, the research WAS done. Much was hidden (for example, the Pfizer/Moderna et al papers that they tried to hide for 75 years, because the answer was ALREADY known.) Other parts were suppressed...read Dr. Pierre Kory's book, "The War on Ivermectin." He was a True Leftist who got "red-pilled" the hard way.

So you're right. If this were only about a difference in birth rate between the vaccinated and unvaccinated, that alone could be just a demographic issue.
What it requires, in other words, is freedom. And Actual "Science."

PS> And for analysis of "Statistically Impossible" events - see Ed Dowd, including "Cause Unknown," on the post-vaxx surge in all-cause mortality.

 

[theleastofthese]

I choose not to even spend any more time in their presence than possible

And just like that, suddenly millions of people are lining up to take the poison death poke.

 

[Mark C]

No, just the few Leftists in AmeriKa who haven't figured out yet how badly they have been duped.


PS> I've actually had quite a few folks thank me for having tried to warn them, whether they ended up listening or not. (Some, at least, quit after just one or two Zyklon-B injections...)

 

[Joleneakamama]

No, I think Samuel has missed his own point. He and other men on here are more than willing to openly discuss the potential (by his own admission) damage that the vaccinated may cause those around us. While actively taking part in things themselves that have been extensively proven to cause health issues. Give me a break.

There is a big difference between things known and reversible, and the unknown aspects of covid shots that only time will completely reveal.

Overweight is reversible. Stress can be avoided and the damage caused by stress can be repaired. The top expressed concern with the mrna gene changes is they are not stop able or reversible.

I refuse to live in fear. I was not aftaid of covid....our whole family probably had it before they announced it was a thing. I will not live in fear of those who got it either.

 

[theleastofthese]

Yet we're supposed to, without solid evidence, believe that the vaccine causes irreversible genetic changes based mostly on speculation and fear? At the same time overlooking well-established science linking obesity to serious, long-term health risks, simply because it’s possibly reversible?

If I was going to spend hours upon hours speculating how others are a danger to themselves and their families, proclaiming that my own family needs to be protected from such people. I'd start with the immediate things that I can control first, things that are actually proven to be more detrimental to one's immediate health.

Edit- And the idea that some of you genuinely believe that your old, overweight-selves are going to be the chosen ones to repopulate the earth and “breed out” whatever you think the vaccine did? Is laughable. Let’s be real- you’ll likely be long gone before any of your so-called “proof” ever leaves the realm of half-baked science fair projects.

 

[FollowingHim]

@theleastofthese, I am sorry I have upset you so much, that was not my intention. I know you are seeking a husband, and the idea that a man could reject you for your choice to take a vaccine - a completely understandable choice by the way in the circumstances, when we all had to make decisions based on incomplete information and under conditions of coercion - is obviously going to be distressing. I understand. You never wanted to get into this mess, you just did what you thought was best for your health at the time, like everyone else. I also understand why you are consoling yourself by imagining I am an unhealthy obese old man, none of which is true by the way, but I understand why this fantasy makes you feel better.

But here are some truths that may be more comforting.

• Just because I say something doesn't mean every man thinks like me.
• Future research may show there to be no risk in marrying a vaccinated woman - as I said my position is purely a precautionary one until essential research is conducted.
• The majority of men did take the jab just like you, and have no reason to reject you over doing the same.
• The majority of those that didn't take it and consider that issue important enough to affect our marital choices will be men you'd never have considered marrying anyway - we've had enough arguments here to know you wouldn't have considered me an option anyway, nor @Mark C, so his and my statements in this thread don't actually change anything for you.
• If God tells me to marry someone anyway I'll always do what he says.

God is in control, and he will have a plan for your life. Love you sister.

 

[theleastofthese]

@FollowingHim- It's news to me that I'm upset, it's also news to me that I'm seeking a husband. I don't even hold a personal vested interest in the topic, and I certainly wouldn’t be bothered by someone rejecting me over my vaccine status... I’d never be drawn to a man who thinks in such a manner about others in the first place.

I just find all of this posturing and fronting amusing and ironic. The amount of time some of y'all spend playing biblical judge and jury over women who likely wouldn’t even consider you viable partners to begin with is hilarious. I have a feeling that if given the opportunity to take any of those young ladies you're speaking so poorly of as second wives, these little holier-than-thou performances that you love putting on for one another would go right out the window.

The irony just gets worse when you admit to not even living perfectly healthy lifestyles yourselves.

Also you have a pattern of labeling women "upset," "emotional," or in need of "comfort" in some way the moment we give your opinions a little pushback... It’s a very transparent attempt at derailing the conversation by attempting to force us to shift our focus towards defending imaginary emotional overreactions that you've invented in your mind about us.

 

[The Revolting Man]

Alright, let’s take a pause on the vaccine debate. I didn’t take it and I wouldn’t take it but @theleastofthese is right that the worst predictions about it haven’t been born out. We don’t want to do the same fear mongering freak out the other side did over COVID.

@Joleneakamama said we shouldn’t live in fear. She is right, we shouldn’t. I believe with all my heart that followers of Christ have the least to fear in all situations. The vaccination status of someone else just isn’t a threat to us.

Let’s leave this here; there is an ample and possibly growing amount of circumstantial evidence that the negative long term effects of the COVID vaccine may have a significant impact on those who took it, including infertility.

That being said, there are those who think that the vaccine provided enough short term protection to the vulnerable that the risk was worth it.

Also, if your health is so fragile that someone else’s vaccine is going to affect it then you have bigger worries. That is all. As you were.

 

[frederick]

Yet we're supposed to, without solid evidence, believe... .

The evidence is solid.... rates of myocarditis and pericarditis, strokes, cancers, infertility, etc., etc., have all increased since 2020 especially in countries with high vax rates. Bill Gates said one of the ways "they" were going to reduce populations was through the use of vaccines, and that's what they have done and are continuing to do. And they pat themselves on the backs, give each other awards, receive enormous amounts of money, as they watch multitudes suffer and die.

Sad!

 

[theleastofthese]

The evidence is solid.... rates of myocarditis and pericarditis, strokes, cancers, infertility, etc., etc., have all increased since 2020 especially in countries with high vax rates. Bill Gates said one of the ways "they" were going to reduce populations was through the use of vaccines, and that's what they have done and are continuing to do. And they pat themselves on the backs, give each other awards, receive enormous amounts of money, as they watch multitudes suffer and die.

Sad!

without solid evidence, believe that the vaccine causes irreversible genetic changes based mostly on speculation and fear

It would be helpful if you didn’t just quote a portion of my sentence, particularly when it was specifically directed towards Samuel’s own claim where he repeatedly admits to not having solid evidence. The context is fairly important...

Edit- I just read @The Revolting Man comments, so I won't say anything further about the subject.