• Biblical Families is not a dating website. It is a forum to discuss issues relating to marriage and the Bible, and to offer guidance and support, not to find a wife. Click here for more information.

Yes, there is a movement to take away women’s right to vote

MeganC

Seasoned Member
Real Person*
Female

(Excerpt from April 2026)

A century after the U.S. passed the 19th Amendment allowing women to vote, Dale Partridge and some other pastors say that was a mistake and are calling for its repeal.

“If we can repeal Roe v. Wade, then I think we can overturn the 19th Amendment,” said Partridge, pastor at King’s Way Church in Prescott, Ariz. “We will repeal the 19th Amendment within 10 years,” he said in a February Instagram post that argued bad things happen when women are permitted to vote:

  • “Women vote with emotions”
  • “National policy is feminized”
  • “Immigrants flood in”
  • “Sexual immorality is legalized”
  • “Multiculturalism is celebrated”
  • “Feelings become the arbiter of morality”
  • “Justice is labeled as ‘harsh’”
  • “Western nations collapse”
  • “Women blame men”
 
At this point in the political world i would not support the removing of womans vote. The reality of the moment is that a family votes as a block. Husband-wife have 2 votes but single feminist has 1.
 
At this point in the political world i would not support the removing of womans vote. The reality of the moment is that a family votes as a block. Husband-wife have 2 votes but single feminist has 1.
That is actually assuming that the wife is not secretly or openly voting against and negating the husbands vote. I am for the repeal of the 19th in general.

I mentioned to a leader of a conservative political activist group that I didn't feel like women should be involved in politics. He was aghast at the thought because women apparently are doing all the actual activist work (events, signage, and putting the time and effort into doorknocking and the like) This is probably due to the fact that the local conservative men are working jobs and supporting their families while the wives have the time to engage in community movements.
 
At this point in the political world i would not support the removing of womans vote. The reality of the moment is that a family votes as a block. Husband-wife have 2 votes but single feminist has 1.

Women tend to break for the Democrats and by large margins. Even Republican women break for the Democrats in many races.
 
At this point in the political world i would not support the removing of womans vote. The reality of the moment is that a family votes as a block. Husband-wife have 2 votes but single feminist has 1.
But less folks are getting married.
 
I literally was on the band wagon to expose the “horrors” of this just over two months ago! I was “warning” everyone. Now, I would vote for this! God has turned my whole life completely around. I got on my FB account and searched my groups to discover I was on all these marriage groups against submission 😳. That was so humiliating! Now that I am on this side of the river, I see better. What a mess women have made of this nation, which has influenced the whole world with her fornications! I pray for more and more women to see their shame, repent, renounce, and return to YHWH and His ways- biblical patriarchy! Isaiah 4:1 makes more sense every single day!!!
 
At this point in the political world i would not support the removing of womans vote. The reality of the moment is that a family votes as a block. Husband-wife have 2 votes but single feminist has 1.
Overall, I don’t see it being worth it.
Feminists, including those in most marriages, still overwhelm the family vote.
 
That is actually assuming that the wife is not secretly or openly voting against and negating the husbands vote. I am for the repeal of the 19th in general.

I mentioned to a leader of a conservative political activist group that I didn't feel like women should be involved in politics. He was aghast at the thought because women apparently are doing all the actual activist work (events, signage, and putting the time and effort into doorknocking and the like) This is probably due to the fact that the local conservative men are working jobs and supporting their families while the wives have the time to engage in community movements.
What is wrong with women supporting their husband’s views and doing the legwork for the community? And the husband votes what’s best for that community.
 
Sorry, but I dont really see why women should not be allowed to vote- could someone please explain a biblically-based rationale for this? And not the "women are emotional" bull crap, because men are emotional too.

We are both made in the image of God (even if through man).

We are both co-heirs with christ.

We are both of equal spiritual value, therefore we are equally human and have the same basic rights- why should women not be allowed to vote?
 
We are both made in the image of God (even if through man).
It doesn’t work that way.
Adam was the only one created in His image.
In fact, when the female part of him was removed, he was no longer fully in Yah’s image.
Only in combination as man and wife can they approach being in His image today.
 
I am fine with women voting.

If....

They can pass my civics test. We are not talking toddler tier drivel as you encounter in random strangers political views either. No firm grasp of American civics and their origins, then sit down and go back to talking about celebrities or nail polish or whatever.

Also they, be they male or female, can not be receiving any financial aid from any government entity, owe the government any money. They will also need to be married and have children.

Same goes for men
 
I am fine with women voting.

If....

They can pass my civics test. We are not talking toddler tier drivel as you encounter in random strangers political views either. No firm grasp of American civics and their origins, then sit down and go back to talking about celebrities or nail polish or whatever.

Also they, be they male or female, can not be receiving any financial aid from any government entity, owe the government any money. They will also need to be married and have children.

Same goes for men
You make some good points.
 
Sorry, but I dont really see why women should not be allowed to vote- could someone please explain a biblically-based rationale for this?
Well, let’s see, since women have been allowed to vote, and the simps that back them up, innocent children have paid the price.

Proverbs 6:16-17 KJV These six things doth the LORD hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him: (17) A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood,

and what could be more innocent than a baby inside a mother’s womb?
And they want to condemn Hitler for murdering approx 6 million Jews, shoot American makes him look like a novice, with our approx 53 million dead babies since 1973 and counting.

Leviticus 18:22 KJV Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.

Leviticus 20:13 KJV If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

Now I know the above two passages have been around since Lot, and we know what YaHWeH did to those cities. But I believe since women have been allowed to vote, this perversion has gotten out of control. If she didn’t get a little girl, she will do what it takes to get that little girl, even if it means mutilating and confusing that little boy, and the same goes for little girls, she wanted a boy instead.

And let’s not forget, just this year, how thousands and I mean thousands of women are pissed that only one MAN caused a mistrial on a woman who murdered her three children. This alone should tell you women are not capable of making good decisions and should not be allowed to vote.

Deuteronomy 24:1-2 KJV When a man hath taken a wife, and married her, and it come to pass that she find no favour in his eyes, because he hath found some uncleanness in her: then let him write her a bill of divorcement, and give it in her hand, and send her out of his house. (2) And when she is departed out of his house, she may go and be another man's wife.

Now, yes, I am aware that men can take advantage of the above passage when it comes to divorce, BUT women have voted to get no-fault divorce, and as you can see today, correct me if I am wrong, but I believe that 80% of divorces are started by women.

Proverbs 31:10-12 KJV Who can find a virtuous woman? for her price is far above rubies. (11) The heart of her husband doth safely trust in her, so that he shall have no need of spoil. (12) She will do him good and not evil all the days of her life.

Back in the day, women loved to serve their husbands, take care of the children, and then feminism reared it’s ugly satanic face.

Women have voted to be “equal” with men in the workplace, and yet they still hold the same jobs today as they did 120 years ago. Child care, nurses, teachers, secretaries, servers, maids/EVS, and let’s not forget the oldest profession in the world sex workers. And you can find that all over the internet. Which would lead us to the rest of Proverbs chapter 6:18-19, because we know that there is a lot of this passage in the workplace.

Back in the day, a man couldn’t vote unless he owned property and I believe we should go back to that.

So, should we take away a woman’s right to vote? Absolutely, women need to realize that they are enjoying the freedoms they have today, because, in all honesty, it is a man who is allowing them that freedom.

If real men really wanted to, we could take those freedoms away, and there would be absolutely nothing they could do.

But what do I know?
 
The man has rulership. Women should not be allowed to vote, because it was the woman that was deceived; not the man. The children of Eve are still being deceived by the craftiness of the serpent:

IMG_1497.webp

It is only through the woman have the Democrats been able to come into power, and pass abomination after abomination.

Perhaps that’s why YAH ordered that the woman be under rulership of the man? Her being allowed to vote contrary to her father or husband is not submissive behavior. And a woman that has left her father to live on her own is living behind enemy lines with no covering and headship; many of them become far leftists/worldly feminists.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, but I dont really see why women should not be allowed to vote- could someone please explain a biblically-based rationale for this? And not the "women are emotional" bull crap, because men are emotional too.

We are both made in the image of God (even if through man).

We are both co-heirs with christ.

We are both of equal spiritual value, therefore we are equally human and have the same basic rights- why should women not be allowed to vote?
Brother, with all respect, your logic is flawless. Unfortunately, the headlines reveal whither this has lead.
By your logic, each automobile should have 2 or more steering wheels. After all, there are often more than 1 licensed and competent souls riding together. And clearly everyone on board has a right to go where they intend to!
I feel it is a good thing that pulling on a steering wheel is not the only way to weigh in on travel preferences. Likewise, casting a vote is not by far the only way to engage in politics. As currently legislated, it is a useful tool in the undermining of family, morality, and society.
Carefully compare the current state of the world with an accurate assessment of where things were 200 years ago: (no, perfection didn't prevail then either). Ask yourself "what were the steering wheels used to bring about the changes, that benefitted no one among the commoners?"
 
What is wrong with women supporting their husband’s views and doing the legwork for the community? And the husband votes what’s best for that community.
I don't see an issue with women being the ones doing the legwork for the community. As long as they are doing so under the headship of and in alignment with their husbands. The problem is you put women in political influence and it eventually leads where we are today.

This happened for centuries prior to women getting the right to vote. One of the main counter arguments to the 19th made by women opposing it was that they were a neutral party who had the ability to voice the need for social and political change without being affected by political affiliation or being bought off by funding.

I think this man seemed to assume that women's involvement would stop if they had no ability to vote.

My main issue with it would be that women in the past have used politics to advocate for change in society that pushed us to the point where the 19th among other things actively passed.

In biblical society it doesn't appear that women had political influence outside of the home. That is being able to voice their concerns and opinions to their husband. I am not sure that women being active politically really conforms with the biblical concept of being a keeper at home. If we were in a society where women were tending to a mans home and children the way intended there is no time left in the day for political activism. That is only freed up by sending children to public schools and or choosing to focus energy away from the home.
 
Back
Top