• Biblical Families is not a dating website. It is a forum to discuss issues relating to marriage and the Bible, and to offer guidance and support, not to find a wife. Click here for more information.

The Light of Lucifer on Divorce

OttoM

Seasoned Member
Male
Lucifer - the adversary - is called the light bearer because his peaceful light engulfs the western world. The standard practice in western (Christian) civilization when it comes to divorce is as follows:

The wife can divorce her husband for any reason, and she is rewarded by getting primary custody of the children and wealth from her ex-master - the husband.

But what does the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob say about it? His law in the book of psalms is also called the laws of peace and perfection:

Exodus 21:5
“If you buy a Hebrew slave, he may serve for no more than six years. Set him free in the seventh year, and he will owe you nothing for his freedom. 3 If he was single when he became your slave, he shall leave single. But if he was married before he became a slave, then his wife must be freed with him.

4“If his master gave him a wife while he was a slave and they had sons or daughters, then only the man will be free in the seventh year, but his wife and children will still belong to his master. 5 But the slave may declare, ‘I love my master, my wife, and my children. I don’t want to go free.’ 6 If he does this, his master must present him before God. Then his master must take him to the door or doorpost and publicly pierce his ear with an awl. After that, the slave will serve his Master for life.

So if a wife decides to leave her husband - not only is she commanded to stay un-married (no sexual relations with any other man), but she also does not get to keep any children that came from that marriage. And she most certainly does not get any of the man’s wealth.

Divorces would collapse and wives would carry their cross/stake and stay with their husbands. Husbands would have more peace and be able to grow their households without having to worry about snakes in their garden.
 
So if a wife decides to leave her husband - not only is she commanded to stay un-married (no sexual relations with any other man), but she also does not get to keep any children that came from that marriage. And she most certainly does not get any of the man’s wealth.
I agree with this conclusion, but the verses used only govern slavery imo.
What am I missing?
 
I agree with this conclusion, but the verses used only govern slavery imo.
What am I missing?
Exodus 20:17
You shall not covet your neighbor’s house. You shall not covet your neighbor’s wife, or his male or female servant, his ox or donkey, or anything that belongs to your neighbor.

Just like the servant belongs to the master of the house - so does his wife. The wife is considered his property. We see this through the righteousness of the bride price - given to her family - and the fact that the man can multiply wives but the wife can’t.

Whatever someone came in with - they leave with:

Exodus 21:3
3 If he was single when he became your slave, he shall leave single. But if he was married before he became a slave, then his wife must be freed with him.

But if the children came during the marriage - they belong to the master of the house. Because they are considered his property.

Be the judge yourself - is it righteous for a wife to leave her husband and take his own property with her? What she came in with - she leaves with.
 
Consider this - if the wife leaves and takes his property (children), and she is commanded to stay un-married - how are the children going to develop without a father figure. Do not the laws of nature contradict this? Study after study shows that children that grow up without a father don’t do so well. However, if the children stay with the father - the father can always add a wife. And the wife that left - as long as she wasn’t with another man - can also return.
 
I agree with your conclusions, but using slavery verses as your proof texts is counterproductive.
 
Back
Top