Yep, my understanding is about 2.5-3 years wages for a laborer.
Quite an incentive for keeping it in your pants… er, robe.
Looks cheap if you ask me.
As wife, she can work so she is income producing asset. Besides, also household income will rise due to expanding division of labor. So any debt can be solved in about 5-7 years.
Besides, not like father is having much choice. Daughter isn't virgin, so potential bride price will go down in stock market during depression plus she is unmarriageble for at about 6 months since they didn't have pregnancy tests. If daughter gets pregnant her bride price will get another crash.
So something else must be reason for this order.
Well, NAP doesn't allow contracts where change of mind isn't allowed. In another word, current you now can't forbid future you to exit contract. What it allows is forcing future you to pay some amount of money to break contract.
I think this functions more like penalty for contract breaking because only in this case now wife won't earn her bride price.
Btw, bride price can be considered as capital investment which means, financially and economically looking, her bride is net present value of consumption of her (her usage by future husband). Here good analogy is housing. You pay either monthly as rent which comes as pure consumption or you buy whole house in one payment (net present value).