It bloody inculcated them into thinking which forces them into an evolutionary mismatch.
-
Biblical Families is not a dating website. It is a forum to discuss issues relating to marriage and the Bible, and to offer guidance and support, not to find a wife. Click here for more information.
The Inverse - Does Monogamy Remove Choice From A Woman?
- Thread starter BiblicalLiteralist
- Start date
It bloody inculcated them into thinking which forces them into an evolutionary mismatch.
Reminded of efforts of various euro countries to start providing occasional visits to hookers on the dole.
Must remember to put that into my mental bank for staving off any potential mid afternoon hunger pangs.
Unfortunately though it suddenly makes me want to start drinking bally whiskey at (checks non extant watch) 7:29 AM. Maybe I should just not think about the degenerate path the west is walking broadly speaking.
Ugh
Sounds reasonable, do we have any Scriptural models?
Not really seeing it as a principal, more of a possible result of sin.
Can see the point of the logical fallacy point. However in reality it does work out that historically large swathes of men never get a shot at reproduction.
I am only a half cup of coffee in this morning so you will forgive my not dropping a reference here but will dig around for it later.
I don't know that it necessarily has to be rich guys as such...not that it doesn't help obviously.
That said, I have been curious for a while though. How much more attention would one get to a plyg family seeking profile if you came out and said something like we are multi millionaires in their description?
I was actually quoting scripture.
That is a good question, straight of the top of my head, Hosea comes to mind as he was being used by YAH to represent Israel.
I definitely have a number of real life examples from people that I know of.
As like attracts like, yes it does happen.
But I don’t see it actively practiced, as in a father giving a wicked daughter to a wicked man. In fact, the practice of a girl being given isn’t really in operation much nowadays. The girls give themselves to whomever catches their fancy nowadays.
So that both become worse?
Essentially whether a woman realises it or not she is created as God's gift to A man.
The term wicked is not OUR definition of wicked but wicked from the perspective of YAH.
Understanding what wicked means in contrast to the fear of YAH allows us to see relationships from a whole different perspective.
Yes, in the main you are correct, women give themselves to whoever they fancy based on whatever metric or feeling they have, and we know, that invariably it ends up failing or being a sorrowful existence, because women aren't really equipped to suss out a godly man on her own, especially after years of indoctrination from societal and cultural norms, Hollywood, Disney, Mills & Boon etc.
It takes a man to look into another man's eyes and talk to that man directly on behalf of his daughter niece etc, to know if a man is any good or not. A woman by comparison in that situation is too susceptible to seduction.
So when it comes down to it, neither women or men can circumvent the order of YAH. Whether they are believers or not.
If a man is complaining about the wickedness of his woman, or vice versa it's because they were wicked in the eyes of YAH when they got together.
If you got a good woman thank YAH daily and treat her good.
No, you take it to far.
Righteous people are subject to temptation and can easily become wicked.
Wicked can repent and become righteous.
It’s not an all-or-nothing thing. Most people slide back and forth across the middle ground between the two, depending upon their feelings at that particular moment.
Not to far at all.
You have said nothing that counteracts what I have stated or what scripture states.
You have just highlighted nuances and confirmed it, which is why men are warned throughout scripture and women are advised.
We are going to have to agree to disagree on this one.
What you actually mean is women giving themselves to men they consider better than their father's pick.
I have just recently read article about guy claiming women don't know how to choose man. Well, it's more complex.
You see, these guys are playing on "I will be great dad" card. Then what are women choosing chads?
Because chad is sexy. And because chads sons will have pick of women. Only issue with chads is that chads don't like to be "forced" in relationship. So sometimes women to get chad to marry them.
Off course, any relationship with chad is risk of being broken hearted. But, there is relationship without risk.
By the way, women left by chad will never admit she is unable to get man's commitment. This is like man admitting no women wants to sleep with him. Both cases are variant of "I'm so desirable that other sex runs away from me".*
*Women gets ick, so no sex for man, while woman gets pumped and dumped.
I'm wondering what character hot woman must have to be pumped and dumped?
1. Be a hoe
2. Be very unplesant
3. Drama queen
Amen
How about flat stupid?
If they are swinging into the saddle casually and quickly then she has failed in her judgement and failed in being parsimonious with the amount of time and proven commitment to a relationship.
Sure you can argue that cultural inculcation will shape the notion of just giving out access casually is now the norm and that a girl can't be blamed.
I don't have a tonne of sympathy for that argument however.
Now I realize answer isn't so simple. I have assumed "pumping and bumping" is done regulary.
First time it happens it could be due to man being very good lier.
It certainly can and does happen. The thing is that if they receive milk level training to not give out the goods after commitments are made, they will be made victim of complete bastards far less often
Still can be left due to being drama queen ever after commitments.
Still isn't single dimension problem. It's way more complex. Sometimes women do destroy their relationship. They shouldn't receive free pass.
In some circles there is saying: for every hot women therr is another man tired of her.
There must be reason for that.