It's frustrating to see "logic" like this. There is so much wrong with it. First, the same could be said about his reading of scriptures with the presumption that polygyny is rejected. Most of us were originally taught on the presumption that polygyny is rejected and the most basic of translations can support that frame. But get under the skin... we know the score. Second, and I think is the Big One, is that so many people, especially in the U.S., have gotten used to having/wanting a law to "allow" them to do something that they forget that any law's purpose is only to require or prohibit something. Laws were not supposed to "allow" anything. Gaahh!He said i was reading the scriptures, that I referred to, with a presupposition that polygyny is ok.
Sorry. </rant>
Interesting. If that day does come, and if it does it will be His will, on the way out, maybe suggest he kick everyone else out who also is doing something wrong. Or not. Your call when the time comes. For some reason I sound grumpy today...We can stay as long as I don't mention what I believe about marriage to anyone else, if I do we will be thrown out.
EDIT: Grammar!
Last edited: