Florida: "squatting is illegal". Texas: | TexAgs
Florida: "squatting is illegal". Texas: discussion on the TexAgs Politics forum.
texags.com
It’s a little sad to me that it says he and Abby are married. Britney is left out. Obviously she is married to him too. What a sad culture we live in that they can’t just say he married both of them.Here's a socially acceptable way to become a polygamist:
One of these conjoined twins got married to her dream man and it has the internet talking
Abby and Brittany Hensel are conjoined twins, and you might have seen them on their TLC reality show, "Abby & Brittany" back in 2012.notthebee.com
The question is whether both of them feel the feelings of anything physical.They probably psychologically feel only Abby is married to him, he's just kissing one woman in the pictures. But you can't get past the fact that he'll be having sex with both.
Off course, politicians won't use state money to promote correct school which makes them uselless.And, if they're economics majors, there's Real Economics (Austrian School) and JM Keyes, et al (aka, neo-socialist and worse).
Wanna bet which are econo-hoes?
Many more likely to be found not-guilty of prayer gatherings, it seems to me...Sad:
4 More Christians Found Guilty Over Prayer Gathering At Nashville Abortion Clinic | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zerowww.zerohedge.com
I wonder what would happen if somebody walked in, sang a hymn, and walked out. Would that be considered "intimidation"? At some point, we do have free speech rights, and laws like this need to be challenged once again at the Supreme Court.Sad:
4 More Christians Found Guilty Over Prayer Gathering At Nashville Abortion Clinic | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zerowww.zerohedge.com
You also new constitution of civil rights and hate law.I wonder what would happen if somebody walked in, sang a hymn, and walked out. Would that be considered "intimidation"? At some point, we do have free speech rights, and laws like this need to be challenged once again at the Supreme Court.