• Biblical Families is not a dating website. It is a forum to discuss issues relating to marriage and the Bible, and to offer guidance and support, not to find a wife. Click here for more information.

Pearl's debate analysis

Some chick who makes money repeating all of the things that red pilled men want to hear, while not actually living that way herself. Sort of like the Tates do. I'm actually surprised to find myself agreeing with her on a couple of things in this video. Lord help me 🙏
Who let a vampire in here?!?!
 
Looks like The Chuck Colson Center is getting killed in the comments section:

Bible Marriages is killing it over there!

I will say this though, when we play this semantics game of claiming that putting away is different from divorce, it is not going over very well. It is a hard sell, and of course, those of us who are familiar with the argument are not all buying it. I would strongly urge that we take a different approach. It is making our case look weak.
 
Last edited:
I will say this though, when we play this semantics game of claiming that putting away is different from divorce,
It’s not a semantics game, there is a huge difference.
How would you state it differently?
 
Looks like The Chuck Colson Center is getting killed in the comments section:

Bible Marriages is killing it over there!

I will say this though, when we play this semantics game of claiming that putting away is different from divorce, it is not going over very well. It is a hard sell, and of course, those of us who are familiar with the argument are not all buying it. I would strongly urge that we take a different approach. It is making our case look weak.
It has to be different or there’s a contradiction in scripture.
 
Looks like The Chuck Colson Center is getting killed in the comments section:

Bible Marriages is killing it over there!

I will say this though, when we play this semantics game of claiming that putting away is different from divorce, it is not going over very well. It is a hard sell, and of course, those of us who are familiar with the argument are not all buying it. I would strongly urge that we take a different approach. It is making our case look weak.
Dr. William Luck has a different argument which reconciles the "Certificate" vs. "Putting Away" distinction. He argues the certificate exists to protect the woman not to give the man license to divorce, but this doesn't reconcile God in Ezekiel and Jeremiah issuing a certificate to Israel after adultery.
 
The problem in today's society is not men divorcing their wives. It's wives divorcing their husbands, taking the man's property, and then re-marrying.

It's un-biblical to have a state issued marriage - another party in control of the man's possessions. Because that state rewards treason against the husband. However, the corporate world follows biblical guidelines. If an employee leaves - the employee can not take the corporation's assets. Whatever the employee came in with - the employee leaves with. Imagine if corporations were structured how marriages are structured with the state? An employee wants to leave Tesla or Apple? They get 50% of its stock and assets. How can a business be successful? Same with the husband. How can a husband run his household if the state encourages rebellion and treason against him - through the easy divorce and stealing of property.
 
Last edited:
The problem in today's society is not men divorcing their wives. It's wives divorcing their husbands, taking the man's property, and then re-marrying.

It's un-biblical to have a state issued marriage - another party in control of the man's possessions. Because that state rewards treason against the husband. However, the corporate world follows biblical guidelines. If an employee leaves - the employee can not take the corporation's assets. Whatever the employee came in with - the employee leaves with. Imagine if corporations were structured how marriages are structured with the state? An employee wants to leave Tesla or Apple? They get 50% of its stock and assets. How can a business be successful? Same with the husband. How can a husband run his household if the state encourages rebellion and treason against him - through the easy divorce and stealing of property.
The Zelophehad's daughter situation, pokes a bit of a hole in that argument. They didn't come into the marriages with nothing.
 
I suppose that might scare some men away from marrying a wealthy woman.
There is an additional book of wisdom from Solomon. It was in the original KJV, but later removed. But it does have a verse or two about the subject:

21 Never lose your head over a woman's beauty, and don't try to win a woman because she is wealthy. When a man is supported by his wife, there is sure to be anger, arrogance, and humiliation.
 
I suppose that might scare some men away from marrying a wealthy woman.
Don't worry.

You can still be gifted "properly" while she is still being alive. That's not illegal or immoral.

Point is that person doesn't lose "material base" which enabled them their station in life by legal theft via divorce etc.....

Certainly man won't be gifted that much by his oldie wifey.
 
Back
Top