It seems like we have gotten the attention of Pearl. I like a lot of her analysis.
If the West doesn't grok that He never changed His rules about marriage, they aren't even following the right Savior.While this Andrew guy is annoying as heck, I would agree with his argument that in and of itself, polygyny isn’t the prescription for solving the West’s ills. In my opinion, it’s only an option that should not be prevented.
The West needs to follow our Savior more intently, regardless of marriage arrangements.
But is marriage the central pillar of salvation and following our Lord? A person could be wrong on marriage, but right on holy living.If the West doesn't grok that He never changed His rules about marriage, they aren't even following the right Savior.
In many cases it's not that they "got marriage wrong," but it's that they flat out reject the character of their Lord and Savior. A rejection of the Word. It's not even in the case of - "I'm not interested," but in many cases they are abusive and call it evil (demonic even). Most of them, however, will testify that they've read the scriptures and consider it to be the truth. Therefore, they must of read passages such as this:But is marriage the central pillar of salvation and following our Lord? A person could be wrong on marriage, but right on holy living.
Or, maybe they are blinded to ONE doctrine of truth.If a Christian calls polygyny - done according to the Word of God - which the Apostle Paul says is holy, righteous, and good - as evil or demonic - then certainly that Christian does not know their Lord and Savior.
1 Timothy 4:2-3Or, maybe they are blinded to ONE doctrine of truth.
One need not be a theologian to be in communion with our Lord.