I agree with most of what you said there, but the burden of proof really is not on us. What we need to do, is explain to the casual observer, that the burden of proof is on the one who claims that it is sinful! We are just fine claiming that it is not sin, even if they think it is not blessed or extolled by God. Part of changing hearts and minds, is letting themn know that the burden of proof is not on us. Dr. William Luck did an excellent session on the Burden of Proof. I wish Mike Winger had at least given Dr. Luck honorable mention! That guy has been a warrior in this so-called "cult".The burden of proof is on us IF we want to change minds and then hearts.
EDIT: Even if they could prove it is a sin, they would still have the burden of proof to show that is as grievous of a sin as they purport it to be.
Last edited: