I married one once, trust me, that lemon ain’t worth the squeeze.
-
Biblical Families is not a dating website. It is a forum to discuss issues relating to marriage and the Bible, and to offer guidance and support, not to find a wife. Click here for more information.
Left-wing women are learning to love Right-wing men
Lemon trees and orange trees look very similar.
Unless she exhibits good fruit with a degree of regularity, she's probably a lemon tree.
faithfulsistersifethe2nd
New Member
S
Thank you to @MemeFan for pointing this out...
Left-wing women are learning to love Right-wing men
A few months ago, a Zoomer friend of mine observed that the American political landscape had been slowly evolving into a gender war. It isn’t simply that Americans are polarised, she noted, it’s that the polarisation was linked to sex. Young men in her circle were more likely to be Right-wing...unherd.com
Political division has become a sexual fetish
A few months ago, a Zoomer friend of mine observed that the American political landscape had been slowly evolving into a gender war. It isn’t simply that Americans are polarised, she noted, it’s that the polarisation was linked to sex. Young men in her circle were more likely to be Right-wing; whereas women were more likely to be Left-wing.
New data published in the Washington Post backs up her observation, suggesting that the growing polarisation along gender lines could be contributing to lower marriage rates among heterosexual Zoomers. Maybe they’re right: two cultures are forming, separated by sex, and we’re priming ourselves for a Japan-ified future, in which both men and women increasingly choose to “Go Their Own Way”.
But it seems this same polarisation has snuck into the fantasies of the fetish community, where “MAGA doms”, and “libtard subs” rule the roost (or in simpler terms, Left-wingers want to be sexually dominated by Right-wingers). Perhaps dominatrixes adopting a “MAGA” persona isn’t so surprising when you consider how fetish communities often mirror societal taboos: post-World War II saw the emergence of Nazi fetishism while ex-Mormons produce pornography about the Church.
Today, in online political fandoms, people behind enemy lines are often seen as potential sexual conquests: Right-wing men want the liberal “art hoe”, whereas some Leftist women lust after the “Right-wing anon”. It’s hard to pin down discourse like this sometimes, but this trend is also substantiated in studies about the dating patterns of progressive women.
In this context, it’s easier to understand why there has been this blurring between the political and the sexual. For one, downstream of the well-documented erasure of gendered spaces has come the attempted dissolution of sex differences. We’re living in a world where there are fewer and fewer men- or women-only spaces. What it means to be a man or woman have both been thoroughly attacked.
This gender segregation feels like a return to the Fifties mean. But while it is possible to police same-sex social clubs or specific organisations, it’s more difficult to impose these same norms on decentralised, often digitally-based, political communities. Segregation is baked into the ideology: for instance, very few women might be interested in joining a Discord server that seriously discusses figures like Andrew Tate. Of course, there are exceptions, but ultimately, making “Right-wing” synonymous with “male” re-establishes a long-standing boundary — one that people probably miss a great deal, whether they know it or not. It doesn’t only facilitate same-sex socialisation, but also reimagines the concept of sexual dimorphism, especially in the social dimension, where it’s been lost.
The second issue is that while the extent of political polarisation challenges the idea that we no longer have a unified culture, it also doesn’t imply complete unity within each side of the political spectrum. Concepts like “intersectionality” have also created their own kind of division. There’s a growing array of identity-based groups, each with its own conflicting objectives and messages, leading to a sense of cultural exhaustion. Uniting based on gender might be an attempt to simplify and correct this fragmentation — even if ultimately misguided.
In an ironic way, political polarisation along gender lines is actually more inclusive. It doesn’t matter if you’re black, white, or AAPI — the primary distinction becomes whether you’re a man or a woman. Even more important than an inclusive political landscape, it may also fix some of our sex problems, rather than encouraging them. In a world where everything is for everyone, this could be the one way we return to signalling older notions of what it means to be a man or woman. For some people, this will rise to the level of a fetish, but for most, it might just re-balance the dating
faithfulsistersifethe2nd
New Member
I understand where @MemeFan is coming from when he says that Jesus isn't enough.
Jesus is of course sufficient for our personal salvation and I doubt that our friend Memefan disagrees.
But Jesus also called us to do more. Some people have turned that around to say that you must perform certain duties in order to be saved and they're fools. You can build a mile-high temple to God and make it out of solid gold covered in diamonds and it still won't buy you a place in Heaven.
The Truth is that a saved person simply wants to do things. Our actions flow from our love of Jesus. They will know we are Christians by our love. That means we are free to show our love in service to Jesus and in all possible humility.
Your work on this earth does not end just because you've declared your faith in Jesus. No, your work is just beginning. Jesus told his Disciples to go into the world. He told them to do something.
It is a slave mentality that says faith does not call us to action.
Free Men and Slaves - Essay by Scott Locklin
The greatest fear of our enemies is that large numbers of free men will stop acting like slaves. Hence their shrill terror of men with therelatively trivial self-discipline to exercise with weights, stopmasturbating, tan their balls or declare they won't eat the bugs.mansworldmag.online
One of the most frustrating things I ever hear from Christians is "I am storing up my treasures in Heaven".
That's nice. Meanwhile your kids are ignorant, rude, cold, and hungry. Your yard is a mess. There are past-due notices in your mailbox. Your animals are neglected.
Faith in Christ does not grant us license to abandon our responsibilities in this world.
And everyone who said that a religious revival is the foundation of political revival is spot on right. One comes before the other.
Liberty cannot be established without morality, nor morality without faith. - Alexis de Tocqueville
not sure I agreeFactsLemon trees and orange trees look very similar.
Solomon certainly didn't need to marry more than 20 girls for foreign alliances for peace purposes. That's 2% of his wives.
He must have searched on purpose for such unbelieving girls on purpose. No wonder he has fallen.
My idea is, choose normal girl, so what if she is leftist. Bunch of them are leftist due to that being trendy, right etc....At least that pwrception in society. And natural followership of media.
She shouldn't be hard to convert since they aren't hard core idealogue. If she is hard core idealogue run away.
You absolutely astound me with some of your proclamations.
If only Solomon had been as wise.
And where did you pluck that figure from?
Scripture never says they were all the daughters of kings (the word "princesses" is a misleading translation). They were the daughters of rich, important people. A tiny handful would have been kings, but the vast majority were probably lesser nobles and wealthy businesspeople currying favour with him - traders securing trade routes, that sort of thing. Hundreds of women offered by those sorts of people is entirely plausible.
Phobias are irrational fears. This ain’t one of those. I can think of four guys just off the top of my head that I know personally who have been through that mill. And from just those four families that’s 11 children negatively effected.
I was just having fun with the lemon part of it.
As far as leftist women, they are usually much more feminist than right wing women. Who often are still too unreasonably feminist, even though they think themselves balanced.
It seems that even leftist women can't stand the lack of masculinity of leftist feminist men. It is as if the feminist discourse unintentionally created a trap to separate the good men from the weak ones, and the leftist men are the ones who fell and therefore are of no use to these women. But because it is unintentional, and these women believe their own speech, this separation ends up not having much effect in helping them choose their partners.
Oh we all know where…
It is for the best that these people do not reproduce.
A lefty once told me that she didn't have any kids. I replied that I am sure they are most grateful for her choice.
I'm going to have to steal this one from you.
How much neighbors did Israel have? Max dozen. So even if we had underrestimated its max 20 girls.
This fixed borders and peace. Rest he could marry Israeli girls. And foreign he could bang only one for claim marriage is done and don't visit ever again.
So anymore that 20 must be because he seeked foreign girls. And he has no valid "reason of state".
