I have no idea how this actually compares, just throwing it into the mix: https://www.politico.com/story/2019/03/19/barack-obama-libya-airstrikes-1224550
So you think that they are choosing to leave some that they could take out?If they flinch, he’ll likely call in the Israelis to take out even more leaders until they cry uncle.
It’s “generally accepted” to be a forgery. However, it’s inconclusive. I don’t think the word “Zionist” seals the deal. These people plan many decades into the future. For example, one of their plans is to disrupt the household. They did it legally through the passing of laws, but also over time through entertainment and social engineering.Pike's three wars letter is generally accepted to be a later forgery, as it uses language which was not in use at the time the letter was supposedly written. The letter was supposedly written in 1871, but the word "Zionist" was coined in 1896. Disregard it.


Not sure. I don’t have inside info. I’m speculating. I just think they’ve got more up their sleeves.So you think that they are choosing to leave some that they could take out?
Other than the ayatollah, which stories earlier said that they couldn’t do?
This situation will be covered by other treaties and declarations. Hell, Iran has threatened to drown us in a sea of fire so many times I’m sure he can cite some kind of national emergency.Well, we're about to see if he acts as a king by unilaterally declaring war, or as a president by waiting for congressional authorization and doing whatever they say. Stay tuned...
The "three wars" letter is absolutely a forgery. The following article traces back the references and completely solves the mystery.It’s “generally accepted” to be a forgery. However, it’s inconclusive.
I never claimed it to be 100% true. However, the set pieces have been laid out for it to come to fruition (Europe didn’t have an Islam problem 20 years ago - even though the letter existed 20 years ago):If that is the case I expect you will dismiss everything anyone says about it, but if you do that you are no longer dealing in reason. Don't be so gullible, or you will be easily controlled. Be skeptical. Investigate things, and be willing to conclude that something you believed to be true was actually false. Otherwise you will have lost all ability to reason for yourself.
As I said, you are considering this religiously. "Believe in" - it's not about believing in something. Is this letter some sort of divine scripture you have faith in and cannot question? Why would you put your faith in this?You believe in the letter or you don’t - it’s not really important.
Bible prophecy says that the land is desolate when the greater exodus of Ephraim and Judah occurs. Both sticks are in exile. One stick forced its way back - not through intervention of the Almighty - but through the intervention of men.As I said, you are considering this religiously. "Believe in" - it's not about believing in something. Is this letter some sort of divine scripture you have faith in and cannot question? Why would you put your faith in this?
Of course the letter appears relevant to today - it was not written very long ago. All it actually says about the Muslims is that they will fight the Jews, and that was already happening when Carr wrote his book, and when Haupt wrote the bulk of the letter. It's not prophetic, it describes what was already happening.
Did you read the article I posted a link to? It's only about 12 pages, and very interesting reading.
I am not necessarily disagreeing with any of that. It has nothing to do with the letter we were discussing, but is an attempt by yourself to deflect and not have to consider anything I have said.Bible prophecy says that the land is desolate when the greater exodus of Ephraim and Judah occurs. Both sticks are in exile. One stick forced its way back - not through intervention of the Almighty - but through the intervention of men.
The state of Israel did not include Ephraim in the re-gathering. Nor was the land desolate when they entered in the mid 1950’s. The exodus wasn’t lead by the Almighty, but orchestrated by the rothchilds. Therefore, the State of Israel is a counterfeit exodus. Not only that - but the 3rd temple - according to the dimensions provided by the prophet Ezekiel - won’t even fit without a complete demolition of many homes around the dome of the rock.
There are Jews that live in the state of Israel - that believe in Yeshua - that reject the Talmud - and I’ve heard from their own mouths call the state of Israel a counterfeit exodus. Doesn’t mean the people born there are at fault.
Regarding Ephraim (Christians) - only a remnant will return and/or be redeemed/delivered.