While a pretty story in parts, there are some marked errors that need to be addressed here.
This is a Meat Topic. Fire at will.
You make a critical error. You state that all concubines submit to a higher order wife. This is not scripturally supported. This is an assumption and erroneous. THAT concubine was to submit to her mistress because she was Sarai's servant woman. Your doctrine of wives being masters of concubines is entirely manmade. You need to fix this thinking.
A woman is not a Captain. She is a HELPER. Don't create a new designation with your own ideas. We are here for "Biblical" families, not "philosophical in the trappings of biblical" families.
Some women are amazing, some women are not worth a bag of rocks. Some women have very little to offer other than hips and a pretty smile. Some women have no good looks but a character and spirit of joy that shines out and transmutes plainness into stunning beauty. Yes we should be called to be men, If we are masculine, strong, wise, and bold, our wife will be happy to let us lead.
This may be worded poorly, but a man who thinks his woman is in charge is an effeminate pansy. I am not my wife's toy, and she is not in charge. Is this a hypothetical scenario describing your prior experiences?
You really should deal with this one by studying it a bit more cause you have a strange idea that I haven't found to be scriptural.
Look up where that hebrew word is used elsewhere instead of inserting what you think the word means.
Rule over you means to be your ruler, your master or lord (ba-al). It doesn't mean an overseer or a watcher, or a babysitter. You got the dominion thing right but I don't know that you really know what that word means judging by the rest of the way you interpreted this passage.
This is wacked out man. "He'll not give you a minute's peace."? What?
I'd like to hear from some ladies, cause this is pretty strange. Yes a woman does want a masculine man, but what's this "stronger and stronger and stronger" thing?
It's meant to be a curse? It was a judgement. It's not a cursed thing for a woman to be submitted to her man and for him to have the rule over her.
Good! Definitions matter!
Monogamy IS actually monogamy, you can tell cause of the way it is. Monogamy is good, there's nothing wrong with having one wife. This hyper fixation on polygyny is a problem. Monogamy is just fine and good, worthy of praise. So is Polygyny.
We are in a world of hurt right now because of the commands of men subverting the commands of The Most High. We are in a world of hurt right now because men have abdicated their responsibilities and stood meekly on the sidelines while evil actors across the world have perverted everything good and right. We are not in any hurt because of polygamy.
I didn't give anything up. Men have abdicated their liberty for hundreds if not thousands of years in many ways. This simplistic statement just simply ain't true.
God has no problem with a man having multiple wives because it's how he created men to function modeling themselves after Him. Don't try to invent some new reason or some new hypothesis for what would have happened with the flood. God chose Gideon to lead for His reasons. Where is the scripture that says God chose Gideon because he had many wives? You seem to make up a ton of stuff for someone who has been studying this for so long.
You wake up and cry a little inside that you have to go be a man? Dr. Nick prescribes you 50 pushups a day for the next 3 months, no soap operas or hallmark movies. 1 shot of wiskey neat AFTER you have chopped a tree down with an axe. Then you need to go slaughter a deer or other ruminant, cook it and eat it. Then grab your rifle and go shoot some steel. Pick up the brass and sniff each cartridge. Then go to your woman, smack her on the rear and grab her boob. Do this for a year and you might have testicles large enough to offset this urge to cry.
This is a Meat Topic. Fire at will.
)
Quite bold of you to assume I’m as feminist as you seem to be.