redfox
Member
In verse 1 Cor 7:10, I think that there is the potential for a semantic argument over the use of the words "should not" versus the words "shall not" or "shalt not" if you prefer. Especially when followed by verse 11, it seems that there is a potential window there for the wives.
If a husband is being abusive to the point of risking the life of the woman and/or children, I would think that it means that he has abandoned his desire to protect said family members, and is sinning against them. I would think at that point, the woman would have a duty to protect not only her own life, but also the lives of her children. I think that verse 11 is quite clear though, when it states that that woman is not allowed to remarry. Just because her husband is failing in his duties to protect and love her, does not mean that she now has the right to seek that protection elsewhere. I believe the word for that would be adultery, and I'd say that the scriptures are fairly clear on that subject.
On the issue of whether a woman should stay in a situation where her life is severely threatened, I think that is a personal question. I believe that if a woman in that position chooses to stay with her husband and do her best to support and honor him even when it is detrimental to her own life, God will honor that. At this point, I don't necessarily see any dishonor in a wife separating from an abusive husband for her own and her children's safety either. The dishonor would come if she chose to remarry instead of reconciling to her husband.
If a husband is being abusive to the point of risking the life of the woman and/or children, I would think that it means that he has abandoned his desire to protect said family members, and is sinning against them. I would think at that point, the woman would have a duty to protect not only her own life, but also the lives of her children. I think that verse 11 is quite clear though, when it states that that woman is not allowed to remarry. Just because her husband is failing in his duties to protect and love her, does not mean that she now has the right to seek that protection elsewhere. I believe the word for that would be adultery, and I'd say that the scriptures are fairly clear on that subject.
On the issue of whether a woman should stay in a situation where her life is severely threatened, I think that is a personal question. I believe that if a woman in that position chooses to stay with her husband and do her best to support and honor him even when it is detrimental to her own life, God will honor that. At this point, I don't necessarily see any dishonor in a wife separating from an abusive husband for her own and her children's safety either. The dishonor would come if she chose to remarry instead of reconciling to her husband.