• Biblical Families is not a dating website. It is a forum to discuss issues relating to marriage and the Bible, and to offer guidance and support, not to find a wife. Click here for more information.

Catholicism declared poly illegal

NewBeginning

New Member
Male
Found something very interesting for all of us.
I don’t know of you knew this or not, be this has been an eye opener for me!

CANON II of the 24th session of the Council of Trent in 1563. (See link)

 
Hi, yes, this is well known and has been discussed on the forum in the past. But thank you for pointing it out again as there are probably others who have joined the forum who are not aware of this.
 
It's much harder to find, and Lew White has written of it, but the RCC 'outlawed' polygyny about the 9th century. (And it worked so well for control that they instituted 'priestly' celibacy about 50 years later.)

Thereafter, Rabbi Gershom famous issued a "t'kanah" making what they call 'halachah' that no Sephardic Jew could take multiple wives, saying, "when christians and jews disagree, jews die."

It was said to be in effect for either 500 or 1000 years (and has now expired either way.) I know Jews who proclaim both durations...
 
@NewBeginning, you may not realize that this decree was specifically designed to counter the reformation. The biggest change it made was to say that although marriage had in the past been contracted informally, and that was ok, from now on marriage must be conducted by a priest, as it was now declared a sacrament of the church. The intent of this appears to have been to scare the population into thinking that they had to stay in the church in order to get married or they would be sinning by taking a wife. The decree is very clear that this is new, and has the arrogance to say that it means marriage conducted through the Catholic church is more holy than the marriages of anyone in the Bible: "Whereas therefore matrimony, in the evangelical law, excels in grace, through Christ, the ancient marriages". The polygamy prohibition was an aside, formalizing what the church already taught. But the turning of marriage into a sacrament under the control of the church was shockingly new.
 
It's much harder to find, and Lew White has written of it, but the RCC 'outlawed' polygyny about the 9th century. (And it worked so well for control that they instituted 'priestly' celibacy about 50 years later.)

Thereafter, Rabbi Gershom famous issued a "t'kanah" making what they call 'halachah' that no Sephardic Jew could take multiple wives, saying, "when christians and jews disagree, jews die."

It was said to be in effect for either 500 or 1000 years (and has now expired either way.) I know Jews who proclaim both durations...
Oh wow, do you have the historical texts of this? Thanks!
 
@NewBeginning, you may not realize that this decree was specifically designed to counter the reformation. The biggest change it made was to say that although marriage had in the past been contracted informally, and that was ok, from now on marriage must be conducted by a priest, as it was now declared a sacrament of the church. The intent of this appears to have been to scare the population into thinking that they had to stay in the church in order to get married or they would be sinning by taking a wife. The decree is very clear that this is new, and has the arrogance to say that it means marriage conducted through the Catholic church is more holy than the marriages of anyone in the Bible: "Whereas therefore matrimony, in the evangelical law, excels in grace, through Christ, the ancient marriages". The polygamy prohibition was an aside, formalizing what the church already taught. But the turning of marriage into a sacrament under the control of the church was shockingly new.

Okay! Didn’t realized that, thanks for the info.
 
Found something very interesting for all of us.
I don’t know of you knew this or not, be this has been an eye opener for me!

CANON II of the 24th session of the Council of Trent in 1563. (See link)

I've long held that the council of Trent is the point at which the Roman Catholic church formally and officially ceased to be a Christian Church.

They anathematized the Gospel.

Yes, it was also horribly wrong on the topic of marriage.

Then again, I'm a fairly "Five Solas of the Reformation" guy so the council of Trent riles me up.
 
I've long held that the council of Trent is the point at which the Roman Catholic church formally and officially ceased to be a Christian Church.

They anathematized the Gospel.

Yes, it was also horribly wrong on the topic of marriage.

Then again, I'm a fairly "Five Solas of the Reformation" guy so the council of Trent riles me up.
It ceased long before that. Trent just formalized it.
 
Are you suggesting that Nicea was wrong on the Trinity, or something else?
I think he means that the net result was that Rome was beginning to assert its dominance? I’m not sure. It’s been a while since I studied Nicea.
 
Found something very interesting for all of us.
I don’t know of you knew this or not, be this has been an eye opener for me!

CANON II of the 24th session of the Council of Trent in 1563. (See link)

They also forbid marriage to priests.

And matrimony is wrong.......it should be patrimony since Bible is patriarchical.
 
Are you suggesting that Nicea was wrong on the Trinity, or something else?
To make a long story overly short - Nicea was when the real split with Scripture went into warp drive. Changing "times and seasons," from His Sabbaths to incorporating many, if not most, of Constantine's 'sun-god' traditions, to declaring "anathema" anyone that tried to keep the Feasts of YHVH, which accelerated over time, as they continued to 'double-down.'

This was when the rift became a chasm.
 
Roman Catholicism is Catholicism remade to suit the Roman mind.

A lot of heresy and apostasy were incorporated into Catholic belief to make it more palatable to the Roman citizenry.

The result?

God = Jupiter
Mary = Juno
Jesus = Minerva, a perversion that showed up in latter day Christianity when Jesus was equated to Sophia, the Greek goddess of feminine wisdom.

This is how the Triune God was equated to the Roman Capitoline Triad of Jupiter, Juno, and Minerva.

Further the Roman terrestrial gods were each equated with Patron Saints who like the Roman gods have specific delegated duties and powers from God/Jupiter.

An argument can be made that the Twelve Apostles were a grouping whose significance was highlighted to accommodate the Romans for whom groupings of twelve held religious significance. There were in total eighty three people who were at one point or another called Apostles. The original twelve apostles being highlighted and the additional apostles diminished.


Twenty Apostles would have been of far less significance to the Romans than Twelve. Twelve being an auspicious number for the Romans.

The Rosary beads are likewise an invention of Roman Catholicism that transformed the twelve (see that number?) Janus beads into the Rosary.

Janus beads were a string of twelve beads with each representing the Duodecimviri or Dii Consentes or the Twelve Great/Heavenly Gods.

A Roman would pray to the twelve gods while using their beads to keep their place in the progression of prayer. Just the same as the Catholics use their Rosary beads to recite a sequence of Hail Mary and Our Father.

And etc.
 
I know I have frequently recommended this book before, but Thelyophthora volume 3 (by Martin Madan) gets pretty in-depth on the topic of how the Roman Catholic Church has messed with the doctrine of marriage and sexuality through the centuries. I found it very enlightening.

The Protestant Reformation helped correct many of Rome's perversions, but not enough of them.

That's one reason we always need to continue to be Reformed by God's Word.
 
Back
Top