bobnsandy said:
If I should enter in a pulral marrage what would be the point if my wife and I are over 60?
Well, my Grandma died at about 80, if memory serves, and my Grandpa remarried one of their friends. Happily. They had several very good years together.
Somehow, I doubt that there was much hot, loud jungle sex swinging-from-the-chandeliers going on, but the companionship was great.
It occurs to me that the answer to your question might be found in noting that the Divine Directive, "It is not good that man(kind) should be alone" predates and takes more of a foundational precedence than "Be fruitful and multiply."
You and your wife have each other, so don't have the problem of loneliness, though if your wife likes conversation and you are more reticent, she may feel that she does. However, there are undoubtedly women of your family's acquaintance who are now alone and not particularly enjoying it. Plural Marriage might well be a wonderful blessing to one or more of them.
James talks about someone showing up at your door hungry. He says to get practical about relieving the point of distress. Feed 'em. Don't just offer good wishes and a prayer. Similarly, make sure you are addressing the point of distress. If they show up cold, give 'em a jacket -- though feeding them a cup of hot cocoa makes sense, too. But if they're hungry, you don't offer to let them go through your give-away clothes box. You feed 'em, right? That was his point.
So what was the "point of distress" towards which he was admonishing us men at the end of his first chapter when he said to "visit the widows and orphans in their distress"? Husbandlessness and Fatherlessness. Pure religion for us men seems, according to that passage anyway, to consist largely of alleviating those conditions via personal involvement. Ergo, Adoption and PM.
Of course, depending on your personalities, the point might be as simple as shocking the tar outa your kids / neighbors / pastor / whatever. Or maybe that's just frosting. *grin*