R
redbeard
Guest
Edited from op. Only Bible verses are supplied.
Numbers 30:2 +
Leviticus 5:4-13
1 Corinthians 11:3
Numbers 30:2 +
Leviticus 5:4-13
1 Corinthians 11:3
Last edited by a moderator:
Technically, logically, legally, you are correct.This leads me to the conclusion that a man doesn’t need permission from his “first wife” to be released from his vows because that’s not Biblical headship. The man can vow a vow in ignorance, some translations even say a “rash vow,” but later realize he was wrong, and even sinning, and go to the High Priest for forgiveness from God. This would effectively free him from that vow.
Sounds logical - but you're still too focussed on the legal layer, and are not fully accounting for the emotional layer. It's too technical. You're looking for the technically legally correct approach, and then doing it in a way that will cause minimal upset to your wife. You've outlined a multi-step process (do this, then that, then that) that will likely fall over the moment you start.I think the best route is to lead your wife in Bible study on topics related to marriage, including the nuances of “vows” and “oaths” in Scripture to help bring light to the fact that though ya’ll were young and foolish, though in love, you were ignorant of the truth. Then, you might say the following (rather than beg for permission):
“In light of our Bible studies on this subject, I believe we made our marriage vows in ignorance. We saw from scripture how monogamy and polygyny are both Godly arrangements for marriage. In light of these truths, I’ve repented to God for making a rash, unscriptural vow. I’ve asked for forgiveness. I’m going to renew the covenant I have with you to better reflect the truth of Scripture.”
Then, you might give a “vow” as follows (this might be better worded. I’m open to suggestions.)
“I love you, and I will always love you, and I want to re-commit myself to being the husband the Bible says I should be. This means I have the freedom to take more wives if I think that’s the wise thing to do for our family. I’m not interested in replacing anyone. I’m not interested in leaving. I’m interested in being a husband to you and whoever else the Lord may lead into our lives. I love you. I will provide for you. I will be here for you. That’s my commitment.”
It’s wise to tell her you’ll give her time to study the subject more and ask questions. It’s wise to give her space. It’s wise to let her have emotions. It’s wise to not look right away for a second wife. It’s wise to keep searching to see what the Father wants for you specifically. But it’s not wise to ask permission. That’s not headship.
Why?Then, he goes to his wife and renews his vows.
As you know, you married Biblically 11 years ago. Without vows. The vows you made later you now know were erroneous, and unnecessary. You can repent for their errors, you don't need to replace them.Since studying the Scriptures, and understanding what happened in Genesis, and what Exodus and other laws say about finding a damsel and humbling her entails, I believe God considers our nightly escapade approximately 11 years ago to be the exact date of our truly Biblical union
Agreed.It’s wise to tell her you’ll give her time to study the subject more and ask questions. It’s wise to give her space. It’s wise to let her have emotions. It’s wise to not look right away for a second wife. It’s wise to keep searching to see what the Father wants for you specifically. But it’s not wise to ask permission. That’s not headship.
Let me tell you my wife's first reaction to reading your suggested new vow:“I love you, and I will always love you, and I want to re-commit myself to being the husband the Bible says I should be. This means I have the freedom to take more wives if I think that’s the wise thing to do for our family. I’m not interested in replacing anyone. I’m not interested in leaving. I’m interested in being a husband to you and whoever else the Lord may lead into our lives. I love you. I will provide for you. I will be here for you. That’s my commitment.”
Yes, they were a suggestion you wanted feedback on.As for ranting (eye roll, head in palms), why? Those aren’t MY “new vows,” but it was a suggestion at the very least. At least that’s what I thought I said.
My point was that although you're right on the vows issue, and that you need to still be considerate of your wife's feelings - the way you were proposing being considerate of those feelings didn't seem to be very well thought through and looked like it needed further development.It’s wise to not look right away for a second wife.
It goes deeper than that. You can just command her to release you and she has to submit. But don’t. It won’t work.Essentially, I’m saying a man can repent to God and be freed. Then, he goes to his wife and renews his vows. That still allows for headship, and that fits a more Biblical approach as opposed to just “practicalities.”
The idea of going to a woman first undermines Christ and God and it also undermines the man.
In either case, a woman may be hurt.
I never made the typical monogamy-only vow to my wife. One of the wonderful blessings of having a wife who keeps all those special treasures is that she kept the cards we each wrote our vows on so we re-read them. Yup, I was free to take another wife, and I have. But I'll tell you straight up; you better have a rock solid couple of women you're dealing with! You cannot imagine what other people will try to do to them, to destroy your relationships, and what their own imaginations/emotions will throw up. The guys here know what they're talking about. ShalomNot really upset, just sorta taken aback. I’m not sure, so I hope I’m not assuming too much, but it seems a lot on the forum assume men just want more wives and aren’t taking their wives seriously. While I think I’d like one, I’m not sure. But the fact is that’s it’s ok if a man wants more. However, when a man says this, everyone almost ravages him, telling him he’d better ask first.
My main point, I think, was missed: a man’s head is Christ, not a woman. I was trying to explain that there’s a way to have one’s vows released from a scriptural perspective and STILL be considerate of his wife’s feelings. The Bible is clear. Everyone’s assuming a man MUST get wifeys’ permission. I disagree. That doesn’t mean I’m just gonna go drag another woman back to my house.
You are correct but it is very difficult. Most men have to level way up before they’re ready for that quest.“But don’t” proves my point about headship. There’s a way to be sensitive about this without capitulating to women and not being the leader.
Some use the word, Promise, others use Covenant. As Christians our yes should mean yes, and our no mean no; we are people who are true to our word. And if there needs to be a change to what we've said, admit the wrong and say what's right. We ought never to be known for being duplicitous, and especially with our wives.I have to agree with I believe it was Mark Henkel, who pointed out that we are not really making vows. We call them vows, but nobody actually says "I vow", unless they write their own vows.
Agreed. And this can be done in a mild manner, without opening the big emotional can of worms of "let's change our vows". Just focus on the one issue and discuss an improved understanding of this.And if there needs to be a change to what we've said, admit the wrong and say what's right.