• Biblical Families is not a dating website. It is a forum to discuss issues relating to marriage and the Bible, and to offer guidance and support, not to find a wife. Click here for more information.

Legal Opinion on Polygamy Prosecution (WA State)

scribner_tm

scribner_tm

New Member
After reading the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) regarding bigamy and polygamy, I was left scratching my head on how the state might look at an unlicensed union of two consenting adults, wherein the man was already legally married to a wife.

I have a pretty good pre-paid legal program, so I called an attorney in the state of Washington (specifically, King County) and asked him if the state would prosecute such a case. The attorney essentially said "If you leave Caesar alone...Caesar will leave you alone..." that is, if you seek benefits ($$) or legal status from the state you are asking for trouble, but if you essentially keep to yourself, don't marry an underage bride, or break other obvious state codes, you have nothing to worry about. He did not even know of such a case being prosecuted. He agreed that something like "helpmeet" might be a better title than "wife" due to the overloaded legal baggage attached to the latter.
 
The world is becoming increasingly hostile toward the Christian way of life and Bible. I was thinking about this and I think if I entered plural marriage I would refer to my wife(s) as covenant girlfriends. I would not even use the word wife, I would refer to them as my covenant girlfriends. I think by doing this you could avoid persecution.
 
However you should note that while the Browns are fighting the state of Utah. Utah is at a loss on how to stop his case. In the Texas case of Lawrence vs the state of Texas, the supreme court ruled that the states cannot impose laws on how one behaves in his own house unless there is an actual crime is committed. This is why Utah hasn't launched a legal case against the Browns.
If we allow the fear of state prosecution loom over us, the state has succeeded into pushing us into the shadow out of the "Norm" of society then they can wash us away by saying we are a fetish and criminal in our dealings.
 
I too live in Washington and have reviewed the legal code. Though I am no lawyer and it would be foolhardy to rely on my interpretation, I can offer the following opinion:
  • Marriage is defined as a civil contract licensed by the state. Common-law marriage is not recognized, thus marriage only occurs if you and a prospective spouse obtain and execute a license to marry.
  • Bigamy is defined as "A person is guilty of bigamy if he or she intentionally marries or purports to marry another person when either person has a living spouse." Whereas marriage is defined as a civil contract licensed by the state, it would seem that purporting to marry would suggest that one tried to obtain a license or did so and married another by fraudulent means while already married via a previous civil marriage.
  • Fornication is not a crime.
  • Adultery is not a crime.
  • Cohabitation is not a crime.
Thus, it seems there is no basis for prosecuting a polygamous family under the state code for any of the crimes for which such people are normally accused in such a relationship. As far as I am aware, the legal situation is similar in Oregon, California, Nevada, and Hawaii. All other states either have legal consequences for one or more of the latter three in the list, or recognize common-law marriage; which then exposes such families to prosecution for bigamy. Perhaps also noteworthy, the penalties vary widely by state. As an example, some states merely consider adultery as grounds for divorce and forfeiture of property by the offending spouse, while others consider it a felony punishable by extended incarceration in a state prison.
 
In Hebrew the word for woman is Isha and many times you will when looking in the Hebrew translation Pligesh which some translate as concubine but I tend to see it like this: He can call me his Isha which is to say I am his woman.
 
You might not be aware that all "STATE OF ...." codes are not the 50 states of the Union that you think they are, but are in fact 50 federal social security districts and they are NOT the same thing at all. This bait and switch is how the federal government can get around the Constitutional provisions and Supreme Court rulings regarding the federal government having NO power to legislate INSIDE the states of the Union.

ALL state codes have two sets of codes, the federal social security district deceptively named "STATE OF..." and also the constitutional republican state where you are left alone and no government can interfere with your contracts of any kind. They put them together so that you think they are all laws that apply to everyone.

As an example, in Georgia, the boundaries are listed as the "boundaries of Georgia" and then there is a separate code line that states the boundaries of "this State" are "within the exterior boundaries of Georgia", meaning that the federal social security district called "STATE OF GEORGIA" is limited to an exact overlayment of the constitutional Georgia republic.

As another example, most state codes will define state benefits as federal benefits, meaning that if you accept a "State" benefit, you are really accepting a federal benefit because like I said above, the State that you are dealing with is actually a federal district and not the patriotic, constitutional, George Washington crossing the Delaware, Paul Revere's midnight ride republican and free state of the Union. This has been going on since the 30's, and it has tricked millions of us for about a hundred years.

The other thing to find in all state codes is a statement toward the beginning of the code that says that the code is a restatement or revision of previous law and code and is not intended to alter or change any existing law. This is a fancy way of saying that no matter what the code says, the original law still applies. This is stuck in there because most codes were repealed in the 1930's and most code lines are not law at all, the judges know it, but all these government scams need an out so that they don't get really burned by someone that knows how they are scamming the entire country. But when you don't know this, and you wind up in court and don't know how to defend yourself against this scam, then you just try to plea down or plead guilty for a lesser sentence.


Blessings and peace to you all.
 
My view concerning the secularist legal system is simply this: They will do whatever they wish and they will do whatever they are told to do by those they would deem their legal authorities — perhaps not always, but most of the time. If you enter into the legal exchange with them you have entered into their game and you must play by their rules. One of the rules is that they get to change the rules and the interpretation of the rules while you DO NOT. It is a folly to attempt to change that system from within. Men much wealthier and powerful than anyone here have tried and died attempting such things. Consider then the time and the days we live in and be content with the protection you are granted by your Maker. Always bear in mind that there is a vast difference between Law and legality. Those secularists who appoint judges over us and lawyers in their court rooms only concern themselves with what is right in their own eyes and how much mammon is in it for them. Don't be deceived. Avoid public court rooms.
 
THEIR game, their RULES. yep

always try to know what game you have found yourself in, what a shitty life and i Thank God there is more than just this.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top