• Biblical Families is not a dating website. It is a forum to discuss issues relating to marriage and the Bible, and to offer guidance and support, not to find a wife. Click here for more information.

Custody Battle

Y

Yaakov

Member
Most of you will not know me; I've participated here only sporidacally, primarily due to the inability to procure a roundtuit. ;-)

I am currently in the midst of a battle for two of my children and do covet prayers.

Please excuse my reticence to share details at this time.

Urgent at this time is the situation with my son. It was foreseen (albeit not my wish) that he would go with his mother when she moves out. He, however, absolutely does not want to go with her. (Thank God.) Friday CPS gave their "ok" that he stay with me for the time being.

His mother still tried to coerce him to go with her during an unannounced visit Saturday. It was necessary to call the police to get her to leave the apartment.

God's kingdom come.
 
Sorry to hear You have such a problem. You never mentioned the age of Your son, but in most jurisdictions, the Offspring can choose which parent thay want to live with after they reach a certain age, usually about 12 years. It also matters a lot of times which parent makes the most money. The Court makes a lot of money off divorces. The parent that makes the most money usually looses. Maybe one day the Creator will set this corrupt system straight.
Me.
 
cwcsmc, thank you for your reply.

What you have advised is good. Thank you.

I am sorry to hear you have been through this.
 
cwcsmc, I had basically done all those things. Sarah and I were the focal point of these children's lives as well as of the other children, too. The mother of the two children in question here played the I-am-a-poor-suffering-victim-of-polygamy-card. That has proved to be the trump card so far.

Not to mention that my lawyer has done nothing. (For proper intonation of "nothing" see sgt. Scholz of Hogan's Heroes.)

The psychologists' reports were/are heavily subjective in my opinion. Subjective in favor of the







I hope to be able to attack them - with another *active* lawyer.
 
Excuse the choppy reply. I'm using a smartphone here, and my fingers are a tad too big it seems.

I wanted to say the psycholgists were subjective in favor of the mother, using semantics to color her as white ss possible and me, of course, black.

An example: She thinks nothing of using physical force. This is, they say, because she is histrionic (i.e. emotional and sometimes the emotions get out of hand).

But let me stop here. I'm sure you have experienced exactly the same thing.

Thank you for the links and above all for your prayers.
 
golden2seal, thank you for your reply. The boy is 7. It is because he absolutely refuses to go with his mother that he had been allowed to stay with me. I hope that will not be attacked since his sister has up til now preferred to stay with her mother.

Yes, may this corrupt system be replaced with God's Law.

His Kingdom come.
 
SATAN'S system, which We live in today, is not a nice place to live, but it's what We have to deal with. You have the "Right to Choose" unless You give up that right. A famous Supreme Court Justice says it best "The only person with rights, is the Belligerent Claimant before the judge." It has been well establisend in law in this country that an Attorney, or Lawier, is Your enemy, if You are in a Court case. His duty is to the Court, as an Officer of the Court, not to You. When You hire an Attorney, or Lawier, You declare to the Court that You are incompetent to take care of Your own affairs, You loose all rights. An Attorney's sole purpose when He represents You in Court, is: To make sure, that when the judgement is rendered, that You have nothing to Appeal. You pay for Your own demise. Neither the Courts, nor Attorney/Lawiers, are any part of Government, but are Private Corporations for profit, making their profit off You. The 'Child Stealers" is a Private Corporation Agency, not a part of any STATE. They claim their jurisdiction through the STATE, but that's Fraud, the Agency is independant. The Marriage License is used as a contract against You to steal Your Offspring.
Look up Marriage License, in Black's Law Dictionary, 6th. License; is Permission to do something which is otherwise illegal. What is illegal about marriage? There's nothing illegal about marriage until You become partners withe the STATE, by asking the STATE'S permission. Same with the Birth Certificate, which the parents give up ownership of their offspring to the STATE. Same with the SS number, just another contract with Your MASTER, The STATE. You have the roght to "choose" Your Master. So, educate Yourself in the proper things. The Scriptures gives You the Law You should live by, and also the History to prove to You the outcome of those who choose not to live by it. The word "law" appears many times in the Scriptures, but most people think of the Scriptures as some kind of religous book, but it's mostly Law and History.
Just something to ponder, but true.

Me,
 
CWCSMC, What You said is very true. Pro se is a trap. Sui juris is not a trap. Look both up in a good law dictionary. All cases is a game of Witts, just like all other games, only You are the prize. The Court is a private corporation trying to make a profit off You. The court cares not what is right or wrong, just which ruling will get Your signature. Your signature is necessary, so the Court Administrater can securitize the case number, and convert it to a security, by the Bureau of Public Debt's issueing a CUSIP number on the Case number, now it's sent to Fidility Investments, and bundled into Millions of other securities, court cases, and traded on the stock market as a Mutual Fund Trust. The amount of cash collected by the court Clerk is minute compared to the capitol generated by the securitizing of the account. The Court's Child Stealing Business is more profitable than one can imagine, until You spend the time to find out how the whole system works. This is all very bad, if You fall in their trap. But, You don't have to get trapped. You have been TRAINED by the System to operate in their TRAP, PUBLIC FOOL SYSTEMS, and PAGAN TEMPLES, learn to think outside the box You've been put into. You don't see the Elite in the Court Systems for the petty things that the common people are.
In The Court's eyes YOU are dead, the judge can't hear a word YOU say. You can file all the paper YOU want to, to no avail, until You become undead.
Look up "Cesti Que Vie Trust" of 1666, You're beyond the sea. Get on "Avalon Project" by Yale Law School, read. Knowledge is power. If You notice, on the Caption of all Court cases, Your name is in all Caps, indicating a Corporation or a Trust. YOU, the natural person, is never charged, nor can You be, but Your "Birth name Trust" is charged. You can't be heard by the Judge, until You enter the case as the "Natural Person". Read, Rules of Civil Procedure 24, and 19, any STATE. This info is a very small amount of what You need to know, to stay out of their TRAP, and is for educational purposes only, not legal advice.
The Creator has freely given Me knowledge, I freely pass it to You.

Me,
 
CWCSMC, You are somewhat correct about the Uniform Commercial Code and the Strawman Arguement, if You are referring to it as the guru stuff passed around for years, by a lot of Patriots for Profit. The argument as You're speaking of, never worked and never will. The Courts are not Article III courts, and are not Judicial. Check out the "Adminnistrative Procedures Act of 1946" All Courts are Adminnistrative, the 11th Amendment took all judicial Power away from the Courts, when they went over to being Private Corporations For Profit. "The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1946" gives the natural person immunity from them, if you know how to present it in court. All Agencies are indipendant corporations for profit, not governmant. See; Clearfielod Trust Doctrine. The Attorneys created the Adminnistrative Act as the 4th branch of government, that's why the common law, and constitutional arguements, don't work in the Commercial Courts.The Codes, Statutes, Ordinances, and Rules, are their copyrighted material, and You can't be held by it, it applys to the employees, and office holders of the corporation, they are the Persons referred to, in those writings, not You.
Check out Ga. Code. 1-2-1 Persons, also Deleware Code. Persons, and Corporations. There's a great deal of knowledge to be learned, but it can be done. Knowledge is freedom. This material is for educational purposes only. This material is not legal advice. Just more to learn.

Me.
 
I know exactly how You feel, I've been there. I also have ask the Creator to give Me knowledge in this matter, and He has, beyond My wildest dreams, and I give Him thanks every day. It didn't come easy, I have over 15 years, solid time and many thousand dollars invested. When I start to do a thing, I'm too stubern to give up. I still don't have all the answers, and I never will. But I know how and where to find the answers to any situation, that's the hardest part to learn. You don't have to know everything, just more than Your opponent, the other Attorney, that's no problem if You have at least a 110 IQ.
They also have more tricks than a Black Jack Dealer.
Every Case is commenced by an Officer of an Administrative Agency, and is an Administrative Procedure. Every Statute, Code, Rule, Ordinance, Constitution and Treaty, is their copyrighted property, and You can't use it for Your defence, directly. The Kicker is; They have to be in perfect compliance with all of it at all times, or the Court has no jurisdiction to hold Court, or render a judgment. You have to know more about their duty than they know about it. You are not the Corporation, nor do You need to disolve anything. They always charge the Trust, created fraudulently by the STATE, when Your Mother gave Your name to the STATE, the STATE owns the name, not You. You have to live with that, but learn to overcome it. Less than 5 minutes after Your Mother signed Your Birth Certificate, there was also a Death Certificate issued for Your name.
Therefore, the reason the Judge can't hear You, You're dead, as far as He's concerned.
Until You come to life, read Cesti Que Vie Trust of 1666. To be heard as a Party, You have to enter the action, by filing a F.R.Civ.P. Rule 24. and Rule 19, for Civil, or an Enter of Appearance, in a Criminal action, both Sui juris. Florida has adopted the rules of civil procedure, the rules of evidence, and the rules of criminal procedure, same as most other States, I'm pretty sure. You use these rules to move in Court, not as any defence for You. Any time somebody files an action against You, the proper response is a counterclaim, force the accuser to prove what He said. When You file the Counterclaim, You become the Plaintiff. Now, if properly done, You're the Plaintiff, and they have to answer Your questions. The person asking the Questions, wins. This information is for educational purposes only, and is not legal advice.
My opinion and I'm sticking to it.

Me,
 
If You was Pro se You're going to loose. Read the Florida Rules Of Civil Procedure. The Rules are Pretty much the same as other States, but the numbers are different. such as the standard Rule for Intervener is Rule 24. where Florida is 1.230. but, it's the civil rules. There's a lot more to it, but it can be learned. You was taken into the wrong jurisdiction, by what You said. Your Offspring belongs to You. Check out the Anthony's Maxims of Law. You argued about Children, not Your Offspring. The term Children and Juvinile is their Commercial terms for Your Offspring. The STATE owns those Commercial things. When You bought Your Marriage License, You agreed with Your other Partner, the STATE to give them the Product generated by that Marriage, Your Children, it's just business. A fellow I helped to learn, is sueing the STATE, and the exwife, for breach of Contract, because the exwife sued for a divorce, and the STATE Court gave it to Her. So, by Law, a Contract cannot be broken by any signing Party, without penalties, unless agreed to by the other party. He did not agree to the divorce, the ex wife and the STATE, both broke the Contract. He will prevail. It had never been done in Ohio. It will be fun to watch. This info is for educational purposes only, and is not for legal advice. If You would like, You can send Me an email, I'm sure there's a way to find it on here. i'll try to point you in the right direction. I don't do business.

Me,
 
cwcsmc: I've not had time to read through this topic in detail, but I did see that you said you lost children and wanted to express my sorrow. I hope they will return or be returned to you.

His Kingdom come.
 
you have my best wishes and blessings.
i did not grow up in p m; however, i did grow up as a pawn for my 'mom' in my parent's split - i was about 10. my heart goes out to you and your son both
j/L "Granny" Matrika / Rolling Buffalo Woman
 
Cwcsmc: I have the same here. My daughter has gone with her mother who is Christian in name only in whom the works of the flesh run rampant. My som refused and is, therefore, for the time at least, because the State is not really happy with that. May Yahweh fight for His people as He has in the past.

His Kingdom come.
 
CWCSMC, I have been where You're at now. I feel for You or anybody else that falls into Satan's trap. I too fell in His trap, because of lack of knowledge of the Creator's Laws, that are in full force and effect, whether You are aware of them or not. Like I did, You can get in trouble with the Creator before You know how it happened. I didn't know what happened. I tried to be a good husband to the girl I married. I got married at 17 and 1/2 years old. I had a nice car, I had a house, all paid for, I had a job, I could do about anything I wanted too. I was taught to work, at a young age.
All was well until I married the girl, then nothing went well. almost 2 years later a son was born. Her family was trouble makers, so We moved to another State, 500 miles away, nothing changed. All the time I could not figure out what could possably be wrong. We had very good cars, new motorcycles, good house, money, nothing worked. I had been taught all My life, to not Quit at anything, so I kept going for almost 12 years. I finally said, enough. I lost more than 1,000,000,000.00 over the next few months, but I did Quit on that round. She got Custody of the son. She had nothing, She was a drunk, She was of a warped mind, She was messing around with multiple other men, and had been since She was a young girl. But, I couldn't get Custody, I learned that it was all about how much money the STATE makes off the divorce. For every dollar You pay in Child support, the STATE gets 2 extra dolloars in Federal Funding. Plus the Divorce Case is Securitized for millions. At that time I was awakened to just how ignorant I really was, as to how Satan's system really worked. I was in SHOCK. I had thought I was fairly intelligent, but I had just been shown how little I knew. I'm sure that was the Creator's way of waking Me up, and that was a sure way to do it. The answers didn't come fast, over 25 years later, but I was seriously looking for the answers to a lot of questions. I'm sure there's many of you asking those same Questions.
First, without Me knowing it, I had married another man's wife. Second, I had married a woman that was not a match for Me according to the time of year She was born. Those two things are the root cause of most problems that cause marriages to sour.
The girl was a good "Christian girl,"She went to a pagon Temple every "Sunday", and done all other bad things the other days of the week. DON'T be deceived by outward appearances, and who people say they are.
Be real sure that any woman You consider a partner, can be Your wife, she may be some other man's property. Once a woman lays with a man, She's His wife. A divorced woman can remary, if Her Husband gives Her a Bill of Divorcement, and that don't mean a STATE divorce. If a man and woman seperates, and She lays with another man, har husband is forbidden to let her return to him. Without full understanding of the Creators laws, concerning marriage, You're illequipt for the job, no matter how many wives You may have.
I finally got it right, more than twenty years ago.

Me,
 
Golden2seal, are you seriously saying that you lost over a billion dollars in a divorce 25 years ago? You realise how improbable that sounds? According to Forbes there were 82 billionaires in the USA in 1989. Either you're a rather rare individual or you're spouting bollocks. Guess which sounds more likely. Now what do we believe from your posts and what do we dismiss as nonsense?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top